T130 Global Drinking Water and Public Health: Conditions, Contaminants, Concerns, and Strategies

Monday, 5 November 2018
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 238-239

WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE DRINKING WATER SOURCES IN URBAN AND SUBURBAN AREAS, SIERRA LEONE, AFRICA

Paper number: T130-12
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 4:20 PM – 4:35 PM

Authors

Abstract

The assessment of water quality for drinking purpose in Sub-Saharan Africa has been widely done using numerous criteria that usually vary from one country to another. In Sierra Leone, the Ministry of Water Resources has established a list of 34 criteria including biological (bacteria and pathogens), chemical and physicochemical properties that are used to assess the suitability of water for human consumption based on WHO recommendations. However, following the recent Ebola outbreak and the need to prevent the spreading of water-borne diseases associated with poor sanitation, both government and humanitarian aid efforts have focused their attention addressing the bacteriological component (Lapworth et al., 2015). As major concerns have been raised regarding groundwater chemistry in particular (elevated iron in the Freetown metropolitan area; naturally-occurring arsenic around mines in the Northeast), it is becoming clear that a more comprehensive picture of the quality of drinking water sources in the country should take into consideration other variables besides the biology. Ten biological, chemical and physicochemical criteria were used to assess the quality of drinking water collected from 142 alternative sources including packet water (73), communal water tank (36), groundwater samples (9), municipal grill (8), and retail bottled water (3). Although packet water is the most widespread and economically viable among all the other drinking water alternatives, it raises the biggest concern for public health among the 5 alternatives based on both biological and chemical criteria: 23% of samples falling above the WHO recommendations for coliform content; 15% above the recommended limit for iron content; maximum E-coli, Total Coliform and nitrate levels. To address the threat to human health presented by packet water, it is suggested a thorough assessment of its content (quality control) and a reinforcement of regulations and incentives to reduce their marketability.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2018AM-323747

© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.