T89 Magmas Assemble! Petrologic, Geochemical, Chronologic, and Geophysical Insights into the Architecture and Timescales of Magmatic Systems

Monday, 5 November 2018
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 240-241

CONSTRAINING THE MID-TEMPERATURE THERMAL AND HYDROTHERMAL HISTORY OF THE BUSHVELD IGNEOUS COMPLEX: INSIGHTS FROM APATITE U-PB AND BIOTITE AR-AR GEOCHRONOLOGY

Paper number: T89-14
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 11:15 AM – 11:30 AM

Authors

Abstract

Slow cooling of large layered mafic intrusions, such as the Bushveld Igneous Complex, was originally inferred from coarse grain sizes, large-scale layering and concentrated precious metal deposits. However, recent chronologic data and numerical modelling suggests the contrary [e.g. 1-3]. These studies indicate that the Rustenburg Layered Suite (RLS), the predominately mafic/ultramafic unit associated the Bushveld Igneous Complex, cooled rapidly to temperatures well below the solidus. The numerical models of the RLS thermal history all assume heat loss via conduction only [1,3]. The conduction-only assumption must be questioned, as there is abundant mineralogical evidence for a vast hydrothermal system within the RLS as well as in the surrounding host rocks. We report 40Ar/39Ar biotite ages for the Eastern Limb of the RLS encompassing a total of ~6.5 km of stratigraphy. Weighted mean 40Ar/39Ar biotite ages lack any systematic variation with stratigraphy and also overlap with published U-Pb zircon ages [1,2], indicating that the entire body cooled rapidly from zircon crystallization temperatures of ~750-850 °C to the ~350 °C closure temperature of biotite. The homogenous cooling of the RLS to the closure temperature of biotite suggests additional advective heat loss due to the hydrothermal system associated with the emplacement of the RLS.

While biotite results confirm rapid cooling of the RLS and indicate additional advective heat loss, the low closure temperature and uncertainty of 40Ar/39Ar dating (±2 Ma) limit our ability to resolve the age differences needed to elucidate the cause of this rapid cooling. We report precise apatite U-Pb ages (closure temperature of ~400-550°C) from 3 stratigraphic levels of the RLS, refining current numerical models and further elucidating whether the body cooled quickly due to advection related heat loss and associated hydrothermal circulation. The U-Pb apatite ages also constrain the rate of paleomagnetic reversals during the Paleoproterozoic, as the RLS records 7 well-defined paleomagnetic reversals throughout the ~9 km of stratigraphy [4].

[1] Zeh et al. (2015) Earth Planet Sc Lett 418, 103-114. [2] Mungall et al. (2016) Nat Commun 7, 133385. [3] Cawthorn & Webb (2013) Geology 41(6), 687-690. [4] Letts et al. (2009) Geophys J Int, 179(2), 850-872.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2018AM-324310

© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.