46 Detrital Mineral Constraints on Appalachian-Caledonide Tectonics
Tuesday, 19 March 2019
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Massachusetts Room
INTERPRETING DETRITAL ZIRCON PROVENANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF REGIONAL STRATIGRAPHIC AND TECTONIC MODELS: AN EXAMPLE FROM LATE ORDOVICIAN–EARLY DEVONIAN COVER ROCKS ON GANDERIA, EASTERN MAINE
Paper number: 46-5
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 9:20 AM – 9:40 AM
Authors
-
John N. AleinikoffU.S. Geological Survey Retired, Denver, CO
-
Bill DevlinRock Bottom Geological Research, Southbury, CT
Abstract
1. Not all of the detrital zircons have been recycled from older source rocks. ∼ 422 – 430 Ma zircons are distributed over a broad geographic area in several Silurian units. These grains are not much older than their host rocks suggesting that there would not have been enough time for them to have crystallized, been incorporated in a plutonic or volcanic rock, exhumed and eroded, and incorporated in formations thousands of meters thick. They are most likely airborne, erupted during early stages of activity in the Eastport-Mascarene arc or other local sources.
2. The immediate source of sediment for these cover strata was internal (i.e. Ganderian), with little if any external input from Laurentia or Avalonia. Significant populations of zircon grains with familiar ∼1,000 Ma and ∼600 Ma ages in these rocks are cited by several workers, most recently Dokken et al. (2018), as evidence for external provenance. However, currently accepted tectonic models postulate what would have been major barriers to zircon transport from either of these adjacent source regions. It is highly unlikely that zircons could have been transported from Laurentia across the deep-water (originally 600-800 Km-wide) Central Maine basin, and from Avalonia across the Eastport-Mascarene island arc/trench complex at the trailing edge of Ganderia
3. Ganderia most probably separated from Amazonia after the breakup of Rodinia. Comparison of age spectra of zircons from our study with timing of zircon-producing events on peri-Gondwanan Laurentian, West African), and Amazonian plates supports the conclusion by van Staal et al. (2012) that Ganderia separated from Amazonia rather than from either potential source
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 1
doi: 10.1130/abs/2019NE-325696
© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.