50 D8. Paleontology & Paleoecology (Posters)
Tuesday, 19 March 2019
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Casco Bay Hall
FLUVIAL ARCHITECTURE OF EXHUMED AND INVERTED PALEOCHANNELS OF THE EARLY CRETACEOUS CEDAR MOUNTAIN FORMATION OF EAST-CENTRAL UTAH
Paper number: 50-4
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Authors
-
Isabelle KislukCentral Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT
-
Willow R. Reichard-FlynnKutztown University, Kutztown, PA
-
Abigail KeeblerWest Chester University of PA, Perkiomenville, PA
-
Shannon N. EvansKutztown University, Kutztown, PA
-
Edward SimpsonKutztown University, Kutztown, PA
Abstract
The 4-10 m thick deposits consist of 4 lithofacies, dominated by trough-cross bedded medium- to coarse-grained sandstone, with abundant conglomerate, and lesser amounts of fine-grained ripple cross-laminated sandstone and green mudstone. Cross beds are 10’s cm thick, rarely up to 2 m. Conglomerate beds are typically < 1 m (up to 2 m) thick. Most clasts are carbonate, <10 cm size (up to 50 cm), and also chert and quartz pebbles. Mudstone may contain thin sandstone beds and abundant bioturbation. The ridges consist of 2-4, fining upward, 2-3 m thick, sequences. Grain size varies significantly along the length of the channel. In a N-S segment, there are two distinct storeys, separated by cm to m of green mudstone. In this area there is a greater percentage of sandstone relative to conglomerate than in the eastern end of the channel. In the W-E segment there are 2 or 3 fining- upward sequences capped by discontinuous mudstone and separated by erosional surfaces. The top of one fining upward sequence contains mudstone with pedogenic carbonate concretions (<10 cm). The overlying conglomerate contains clasts of the mudstone with concretions.
Multi-storey channel deposits reflect repeated channel deposition in the same location, but separated by significant time intervals. Mudstone beds reflect floodplain overbank and lacustrine deposition; paleosol development indicate significant time between channel deposition in a particular area. Resistant cementation of the uppermost channel deposits has preserved the sequences; it is not clear if the sinuous shapes to the ridges reflect the true nature of the channel planform of the Ruby Ranch fluvial systems.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 1
doi: 10.1130/abs/2019NE-328242
© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.