115 D13. Recent Advances in Marine/Coastal Science (Posters)
Monday, 23 September 2019
9:00 AM - 6:30 PM
Hall AB, North Building
A COMPARISON OF SEDIMENT CORES FROM THE DEEP SEA DRILLING PROJECT; A CLAY MINERALOGICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Paper number: 115-2
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:30 PM
Authors
-
Cole FarnamWater Mill, NY
-
Mitchell MrusUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
-
Kyle RobertsUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
-
Kenneth B. TankersleyUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
-
Warren HuffUniv of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
Abstract
T-tests show no statistical geochemical differences between the top and bottom, and no statistical difference between separate sites. Although these samples are statistically similar according to t-test results, the samples appear to differ when speaking in mineralogical terms. The origins of these sediment samples were determined based on differences in their clay mineralogy. High smectite percentages were shown within the Gulf samples; having the highest percentages closer to the mouth of the Mississippi Delta. Illite percentages were highest off the east coast of the USA. Chlorite/kaolinite percentages were highest in the Bermuda province, which reflected a potentially different source.
Understanding the overall differences in clay mineralogy of the cores from various provenances allows for a better understanding of the sediment sources. The clay mineralogy of the Atlantic margin cores shows a more mature, illite-rich sediment source, which is characteristic of a passive margin. The clay mineralogy of the Bermuda samples contained higher amounts of chlorite and kaolinite than the other provinces. This difference could be affected by aeolian sand deposits from the Sahara or could be the result of a local volcanic source. The clay mineralogy of the Gulf Coast cores contains the highest percentage of smectite when compared with the cores from the other provenances, which is a result of the influx terrestrial sediments from the Mississippi River.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5
doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-331442
© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.