T176 Advancements in Energy Geology: The Best of American Association of Petroleum Geologists Technical Talks 2018
Tuesday, 24 September 2019
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 127ABC, North Building
A DETERMINISTIC MODEL FOR OUTCROP TO SUBSURFACE WIRELINE LOG CORRELATION, EOCENE GREEN RIVER FORMATION, EASTERN UINTA BASIN, COLORADO AND UTAH
Paper number: T176-4
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:35 AM – 8:50 AM
Authors
-
J. Frederick SargColorado School of Mines, Golden, CO
Abstract
To solve for four components, clay volume is calculated before RHOmaa and Umaa values. Each well examined is individually zoned by petrophysical properties and a neutron density crossplot is used to understand clay densities. By assigning values to the clay density and clay photoelectric effect, the clay component of the overall RHOmaa and Umaa values is excluded for each given depth. Then, the altered RHOmaa and Umaa value can be cross-plotted and examined in a ternary diagram. This determines the relative percentage of quartz, calcite, and dolomite in relation to the clays.
This petrophysical method is not without limitations. Borehole conditions must be considered. The system can only identify three constituents at a time. Data points will drift on the cross-plot due to diverse mineralogy. Diagenetic minerals also cause data point drift that must be corrected for and here include analcime and sodium-rich feldspars.
The deterministic model allows for more detailed correlations that show vertical lithofacies variability and stratigraphic changes from littoral to profundal lake environments. Thin clean limestone beds are clearly identified. High-feldspathic rocks require a more mobile quartz end point, but result in the identification of thin siliciclastic beds. Lake margin wells have the highest quartz percentages. Carbonate percentages increase basinward. The gamma ray and neutron-density calculated clay volumes are more consistent in the lower Douglas Creek Member than the Parachute Creek Member, indicating an increase in diagenetic minerals in the upper Green River.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5
doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-331914
© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.