T43 Laurentian Evolution during the Late Mississippian to Early Permian: Interactions and Feedbacks between Tectonism, Climate, and Sedimentary Systems (Posters)

Sunday, 22 September 2019
9:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Hall AB, North Building

TECTONIC SUBSIDENCE ANALYSIS OF THE MIDLAND BASIN AND EASTERN SHELF: INFORMING ANCESTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAIN EVOLUTION

Paper number: T43-1
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 5:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

The Midland Basin of West Texas is an intracratonic basin that began to form in the Early Pennsylvanian due to the collision between Laurentia and Gondwana. Contemporary basins such as the Anadarko, Paradox, and Orogrande also formed as a part of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains (ARM). The evolution and deformation of ARM basins is widely debated. The application of subsidence analysis to the Midland Basin and Eastern Shelf are used to illuminate basin evolution and provide constraints for the proposed ARM tectonic models. Chronostratigraphic data must be obtained to construct subsidence curves; however, this aspect is commonly a challenge in ARM basins due to poor biostratigraphic data, lack of coeval volcanic activity, and Cenozoic thermal overprinting.

This research utilizes chronostratigraphic surfaces constructed from >2000 fusulinid biostratigraphic reports across the Midland Basin. These chronostratigraphic surfaces represent time-surfaces of each stage within the Pennsylvanian and early Permian. Three locations within the axis of the basin and three locations along the shelf have been chosen to apply backstripping, utilizing the regional chronostratigraphic surfaces for age control.

Preliminary results yielded tectonic subsidence curves similar to the two-phase subsidence model produced for the Anadarko Basin. The two phases are represented as the initiation of subsidence in the Atokan through peak subsidence in the Canyon (Missourian) and reduced subsidence in the Cisco (Virgilian). The Wolfcampian demonstrates an uptick in subsidence compared to the Cisco (Virgilian). Additionally, the resulting subsidence rates in the basin are approximately six times greater than the rates of subsidence observed on the shelf. The Canyon (Missourian) shows the greatest rate of subsidence throughout the Pennsylvanian and Permian on both the shelf and in the basin. From the decompacted thickness curves, it is apparent that the basin was starved of sediment until the Permian when the basin experienced a greater influx of sediment. Future work includes using the graphic correlation method to plot the last appearance datums at the six locations to determine their correlation as well as comparing decompacted thicknesses to determine sediment accumulation rates and patterns.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-332824

© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.