T256 Investigations of Hydrothermal Systems: Advances and Challenges (Posters)

Wednesday, 25 September 2019
9:00 AM - 6:30 PM
Hall AB, North Building

THE GRAPHITE CREEK FLAKE GRAPHITE DEPOSIT, SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA: A PRODUCT OF IN SITU METAMORPHISM AND/OR HYDROTHERMAL FLUIDS?

Paper number: T256-13
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

Graphite is considered a critical mineral by the US Government for its high demand in battery and electronic technologies. The Graphite Creek deposit (10.95 Mt at 7.8% Cg; measured and indicated), Seward Peninsula, Alaska, is the largest flake graphite deposit in the United States, yet its genesis remains unclear. New drill core observations, petrography, and carbon (C) isotope data provide insights into the mineralizing processes and possible carbon source(s) in the system.

The Graphite Creek deposit is hosted in granulite-facies metamorphic rocks on the fault-bounded northern edge of the Kigluaik gneiss dome. Mineralization is sub-continuous along strike for 18 km. Graphite ores are hosted in strongly-deformed sillimanite-quartz-feldspar-biotite-graphite-garnet gneiss of uncertain age. Graphite occurs most commonly as foliated flake disseminations and mm-scale layers, but also forms 0.1 – 0.5 m-thick massive lenses (veins?) composed almost entirely of pure flake graphite and lesser quartz that have inclusions of foliated biotite and porphyroblastic garnet. The massive lenses are generally concordant with macrofolds but are locally discordant with the dominant gneissic foliation. Intercalated with the graphite-rich sillimanite gneiss unit is a sillimanite-absent quartz-plagioclase-biotite gneiss unit with minor disseminated flake graphite and pyrrhotite. Both gneisses contain migmatitic textures and lack carbonate or significant calc-silicate assemblages that might invoke calcareous protoliths. Tectonically-late quartz – feldspar ± tourmaline ± graphite pegmatite dikes and late Cretaceous granite stocks that have recrystallized contacts cut the gneisses. Preliminary 13CPDB values for graphite in the sillimanite gneiss cluster tightly around -21 ‰, while graphite in the quartz-biotite gneiss is heavier at -15 ‰; both suggest an organic carbon source.

Collectively, these observations are difficult to reconcile with genetic models for graphite systems that invoke metamorphic processes (i.e. in situ graphitization or localized decarbonation) or hydrothermal activity separately. Our evidence suggests a combination of metamorphism and hydrothermal activity. Understanding the nature of this deposit will provide insights for graphite ore genesis and aid in prospectivity analysis.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-333762

© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.