T32 Advances in Understanding Processes at or Near the Groundwater–Surface Water Interface (Posters)

Sunday, 22 September 2019
9:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Hall AB, North Building

DIVERGENCE IN BANK STORAGE METRICS: CONSTANT VERSUS TRANSIENT HYDRAULIC GRADIENT

Paper number: T32-2
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 5:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

The hydraulic gradient along stream/aquifer boundary is one of the most variable parameters in a stream/aquifer system. The regional hydraulic gradient (RHG) towards a stream had been often neglected or considered linear and static while estimating bank storage. In this study, I used a non-linear, transient RHG to estimate the bank storage in response to a hypothetical flood wave. The purpose of this study was to compute bank storage separately using a constant vs a transient RHG and estimate the difference between two corresponding results. For a constant RHG, it was considered that head at the valley wall was H unit higher than the head at the stream throughout the simulation. However, for a transient RHG, the water level in the aquifer was instantaneously raised by H units throughout the aquifer width, then the groundwater was drained under natural gradient until the transient RHG at the stream/aquifer boundary matches with the constant RHG for both fully penetrating streams with and without streambed sediments. Water table thus obtained was slightly different from that of the constant RHG. A convolution-integral method was used to estimate flux across the stream/aquifer boundary. Results showed that bank storage was higher and baseflow started later in time for the transient RHG than that for the constant RHG. Furthermore, the difference in bank storage between the two RHG diverged significantly and increased after the critical time. Flood duration longer than the critical time requires consideration of a transient RHG for better estimation of bank storage, especially for narrow but high transmissive alluvial aquifers.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-334201

© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.