T251 Arsenic in Global Groundwater-Based Drinking Water Systems—Source-Water Characteristics, Safe Limits, Human-Health Impacts, Innovative Treatment Systems, and Policy Instruments

Wednesday, 25 September 2019
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 105BC, West Building

ENHANCED ARSENIC REMOVAL IN RAPID SAND FILTRATION – A PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT OF FE(II), FE(III) AND NAMNO4 DOSING FOR AS REMOVAL <1 ΜG/L AT WTP PRINSENBOSCH

Paper number: T251-8
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:35 AM – 9:50 AM

Authors

Abstract

Arsenic is a toxic element. The WHO Standard is 10 μg/l, but since 2016, the Dutch drinking water companies adopted a goal of <1 μg/l. For Brabant Water, this resulted in the need to enhance As removal at seven water treatment plants (WPT’s). Earlier research had shown that dosing of NaMnO4 to an aeration-filtration system efficiently reduces As concentrations, which lead to the implementation of NaMnO4 at WTP’s Dorst and Prinsenbosch. However, also undesired operational side-effects occurred, like decreased filter run time, breakthrough of particles and poor thickening of backwash sludge.

Consequently, 3 alternatives (dosing of NaMnO4, Fe(III) and Fe(II)) to enhance the As removal to < 1 μg/l at WTP Prinsenbosch were investigated. The assessment is based on the results of (full-scale and) pilot-plant research and includes not only the removal of As, but also the operational aspects.

It was found that Fe(III) was slightly more effective than Fe(II) and NaMnO4 for the removal of As, but at doses of 1.3 mg/l NaMnO4, 0.7 mg/l Fe(III) or 1.2 mg /l Fe(II) a water quality of 0.7 μg As/l could be obtained with all 3 chemicals. However, the impact on the operational aspects proved to be quite different. The dosing of Fe(II) lead to 50% longer filter run times and backwash production, no breakthrough and better thickening of the backwash water sludge (400%).

The differences in the impact on the filtration process and sludge properties between Fe(II) and Fe(III) and NaMnO4 are most likely explained by a different densities and structures of the Fe(III)oxyhydroxides and Mn(IV) oxides formed in the filter

The conclusion of the research for WTP Prinsenbosch is that Fe(II) is the preferred chemical in view of the superior operational aspects. In Arpil 2019, Fe(II) was implemented at the full scale plant.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-334529

© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.