T169 Chemostratigraphy: Physical and Temporal Applications

Tuesday, 24 September 2019
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 224B, North Building

STRONTIUM ISOTOPES IN CARBONATE FROM THE EAGLE FORD GROUP AT THE CENOMANIAN-TURONIAN BOUNDARY IN NORTH-CENTRAL TEXAS: A POSSIBLE PROXY FOR SEAWATER COMPOSITION

Paper number: T169-12
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 10:50 AM – 11:05 AM

Authors

Abstract

The Eagle Ford Group and associated Cenomanian-Turonian (C-T) strata in Texas have been estimated to contain 8.5 billion barrels of oil and 66 trillion cubic feet of gas in continuous accumulations in onshore lands of the U.S. Gulf Coast region (Whidden et al., USGS Fact Sheet 2018-3033, https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20183033). The Eagle Ford Group was deposited from ~96 to 90 Ma encompassing the time of Ocean Anoxic Event 2. In order to improve understanding of the stratigraphy and regional correlations, shallow drill core penetrating the Eagle Ford Group has been sampled from three locations. The only core studied to date, USGS Gulf Coast #1 (GC-1), was drilled near Waco, Texas in 2015. Mudstones and marls of the Eagle Ford Group and underlying Pepper Shale were cored at depths from 159 to 408 feet. Sampling targeted white or light-colored material, corresponding to shells, foraminifera accumulations, and micritic calcite layers.

Samples were removed from the core by sawing. Carbonate-rich material and shells were isolated by breaking the samples into small fragments using stainless-steel tools under a binocular microscope. Samples were leached with 1M acetic acid for 1 h at room temperature, followed by a second leach with 3M acetic acid for 3 days at 120 °C. Both leachates were decanted and analyzed for strontium isotope composition by thermal ionization mass spectrometry; the final residues, dissolved in a mixture of HF and HNO3, were also analyzed for Sr isotopes.

The first leach contained more radiogenic Sr with higher 87Sr/86Sr than the second leach, and the residues were much more radiogenic than both leachates. This is consistent with the concept of the first leach removing adhered, easily dissolved carbonate that may be post-deposition; in this case, we think, the second leach is the best representation of the composition of parent seawater. The results on residues show that addition of Sr derived from silicates to carbonate leachates would lead to erroneously larger 87Sr/86Sr values. The analyses of the second leachate indicate decreasing 87Sr/86Sr across the C-T boundary, partially consistent with the seawater 87Sr/86Sr curve. Some samples from the upper Eagle Ford show larger values indicating either a shift in seawater 87Sr/86Sr or that these samples are more affected by diagenesis or silicate-derived Sr.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-336694

© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.