T265 Innovative Tools for Mapping, Modelling, and Sharing 3D Geological Data: Drones, Photogrammetry, Lidar, Virtual, and Augmented Reality (Posters)
Wednesday, 25 September 2019
9:00 AM - 6:30 PM
Hall AB, North Building
IN-SITU UTILITY OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (DRONES) FOR GEOLOGIC FIELDWORK
Paper number: T265-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:30 PM
Authors
-
Michele CookeUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA
-
Ake FagerengCardiff University, Cardiff
-
Thomas ShipleyTemple University, Philadelphia, PA
-
Katie BatemanTemple University, Bensalem, PA
-
Basil TikoffUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
-
Randy Williams318 Island DrApt 10, Madison, WI
-
Alexandra DavatzesTemple University, Philadelphia, PA
-
Naomi BarshiUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
-
M. Ani HsiehUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
-
Arjun KumarUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Abstract
Three experts were asked to complete three field scenarios (one day per scenario). 1. Interpret a large-scale vertical outcrop from the ground, then fly the UAV and see if the availability of in-situ imagery (from down-plunge view) changes the interpretation or confidence in the interpretation. 2. Conduct an initial field area survey to consider regions of interest, then fly the UAV for further exploration. 3. In a structurally complex area that has four existing (and competing) models of fault interaction, fly the UAV to evaluate the models in-situ and tease apart what is happening. We observed experts flight strategies could be characterized using a two-by-two matrix of scale (narrow, wide) and method (data-driven, model-driven); e.g., experts who initially had no strong model for what was happening on a wide scale would fly to get a broad-view and look for interesting features, but once experts developed a wide scale model they would run a t-flight, flying along strike and then perpendicular to strike. We also observed that the new perspectives and orientations provided by the UAV in-situ presented new challenges for the visual interpretation of geologic processes; e.g., experts often reported not knowing where they were in space, not understanding where the UAV was “looking”, and feeling overwhelmed with what the UAV sees.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5
doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-338767
© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.