T54 Advances in Alpine Glacier Studies through Process and Chronology: In Honor of Gerald Osborn for His Career and Contributions to the Field

Sunday, 22 September 2019
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 224A, North Building

IS TERRESTRIAL COSMOGENIC NUCLIDE DATING THE NEW LICHENOMETRY?

Paper number: T54-14
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 4:50 PM – 5:05 PM

Authors

  • Brian Menounos Presenting Author
    University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC

Abstract

Terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide dating (TCN) has arguably been the most important advance in reconstructing Holocene glacier fluctuations since the advent of radiocarbon dating. An advantage of TCN dating, like the radiocarbon method, is the reproducibility of a sample’s isotopic concentration for a given sample. Improvements in analytical techniques have further refined TCN dating to yield ages with reported errors (±1 σ) that are often below 10% of a sample’s age. In contrast to TCN, some have suggested that lichenometry is a pseudo-science largely because it is purported to be based on: lack of consensus on methodology; invalid assumptions about lichen identification; treatment of errors; and relation between lichen growth and factors unrelated to time since deposit stabilization. While TCN concentrations are reproducible for a given sample with high analytical precision, the calculation of a TCN age is subject to many of the same warts and wrinkles that beset lichenometry. One unsightly wart includes the lack of an objective-based approach to outlier identification that considers both statistical and non-statistical arguments. Deeply incised wrinkles include a lack of systematic treatment (or omission) of environmental factors that could influence TCN concentrations including time-varying changes in surface erosion and snow cover, and the uncertain geomorphic history of a given deposit. Further advances in TCN dating will probably not arise from improved production rates, reduced counting errors or use of tandem measurements, but, rather, a critical assessment of environmental factors that influence the final age of a given sample. Carefully designed inter-comparison studies would help to quantify the importance of these factors and how they influence the final reported age of a given TCN sample.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-338871

© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.