T230 Making Sense of Methodologies and Theoretical Frameworks in Geoscience Education Research

Tuesday, 24 September 2019
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 101AB, West Building

RETHINKING INITIATIVES TO INCREASE DIVERSITY IN STEM: A NEW CAPITAL FRAMEWORK MODEL

Paper number: T230-8
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 3:15 PM – 3:30 PM

Authors

  • Patricia Jaimes Presenting Author
    Geocognition Research Laboratory, East Lansing, MI

Abstract

Science educators have long tried to understand how to increase the participation of underrepresented minorities (URM’s) in STEM, with capital - non-financial and financial resources that allow individuals to succeed in life - playing an important role. Historically, STEM initiatives to increase diversity, such as student research programs, have focused on providing only two types of capital to URM’s: 1) social capital, by connecting them with scientific mentors and 2) cultural capital, teaching them scientific norms. Although providing these capitals are useful for recruiting URM’s into STEM, lack of diversity continues to be a problem, suggesting that these efforts need to focus not just on recruitment but also on retention. Unfortunately, most initiatives do not recognize that for many URM’s, capitals derived from non-scientific sources are just as important to their career success as those derived from scientific sources.

This study seeks to understand the capitals that URM scientists accessed while pursuing a scientific career. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with URM scientists (N=16) who identified as Latinx, African American, Queer, or Disabled. Interviews explored participant’s academic and career experiences in STEM. Interviews were analyzed using a predetermined coding scheme (deductive coding). The capitals most important to participants were social (networks) and intrinsic (internal motivation). Access to social capital derived primarily from mentors and family. Although access to cultural capital (scientific knowledge) and economic capital (financial resources) was also important for progressing in their scientific careers, participants could only access these through first accessing social capital. Social, cultural, and economic capitals were categorized as external capitals because they derived from outside influences. Intrinsic capital emerged when participants encountered social barriers such as poverty, racism, ableism, or sexism, allowing participants to push back and defy social barriers to persist in their scientific endeavors. I present a new capital framework model that demonstrates how external capitals are derived and interconnected and how intrinsic capital enables URM scientists to persist in scientific careers.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-339608

© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.