T79 Diversifying Geochronology: Innovations in Techniques, Applications, and Perspectives
Monday, 23 September 2019
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 225AB, North Building
APATITE 4HE/3HE THERMOCHRONOLOGY AND THE TOPOGRAPHIC DEVELOPMENT OF YOSEMITE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
Paper number: T79-10
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 10:25 AM – 10:40 AM
Authors
-
Matthew FoxUniversity College London, London
-
David L. ShusterUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
-
Kurt M. CuffeyUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
-
Greg StockYosemite National Park, El Portal, CA
Abstract
The debate of western Sierran canyon origin today focuses on the timing of incision. Were these canyons carved in the Late Cretaceous, as House et al. (1998) suggest, or are they largely Miocene to Pliocene features (e.g. Wakabayshi, 2013)? In this contribution, we use single-crystal apatite 4He/3He thermochronology to explore the timing of incision of Yosemite Valley, arguably the most famous of these canyons, and whether our data can disentangle the fluvial versus glacial components.
We collected samples from 11 bedrock sites located in and around Yosemite Valley, and resultant apatite (U-Th)/He ages vary. In the depths of Yosemite Valley, ages are ~40 Ma, whereas downstream, in rocks with no evidence of past glaciation, ages range from ~70-80 Ma. Samples from the upland surfaces north of Yosemite are >60 Ma.
Apatite 4He/3He data allow us to search time-temperature space for probable thermal histories. Samples within the glaciated landscape of the valley bottom support late Cenozoic rapid cooling. Samples located outside the regions of glaciation (e.g. downstream samples and northern upland surface samples) instead show an early Cenozoic cooling signal, likely related to exhumation after pluton emplacement. We will discuss this thermal modeling in detail while probing various complexities, such as non-uniform U-Th concentration distribution and radiation damage. Finally, we will address how well these data elucidate the degree to which the topography formed by fluvial versus glacial processes.
Matthes (1930) USGS Prof. Paper
Wakabayshi (2013) Geosphere
House et al. (1998) Nature
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 51, No. 5
doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-341090
© Copyright 2019 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.