30 Geology and Geophysics of the Coso Geothermal Field and Source Area of the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence I: A Tribute to the Career of Francis C. (“Frank”) Monastero
Thursday, 14 May 2020
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Madera Room
THE TIMING AND TEMPO OF QUATERNARY RHYOLITE DOME CONSTRUCTION AT THE COSO VOLCANIC FIELD
Paper number: 30-3
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 8:30 AM – 8:50 AM
Authors
-
Jorge A. VazquezMenlo Park, CA
-
Matthew A. CobleVictoria University of Wellington, Wellington
Abstract
Potassium-Argon geochronology published in the late 1970’s, and subsequent 40Ar-39Ar and U-Th-Pb geochronology defined the emplacement history of the rhyolitic portion of the CVF. However, of the 17 youngest rhyolite domes, which represent ~60% of the total silicic volume erupted by the entire system, only 8 have been directly dated, with just a handful of these being revisited after initial efforts in the 1970’s. Existing data precludes construction of a comprehensive eruption history of the most voluminous portion of the volcanic field, hindering an accurate assessment of hazard potential at the CVF. This presented an opportunity to apply modern isotopic measurement techniques to more accurately and precisely date CVF domes.
Toward this goal, we present zircon ± allanite in-situ uranium-series ion-microprobe (SHRIMP-RG) surface dates on the 17 youngest CVF rhyolites. Dating co-crystallizing zircon and allanite, which have very different U and Th isotopic compositions, increases age accuracy and precision relative to single-phase dating. Surface dating permits sampling and dating of the last zircon and allanite to crystallize within the erupted magma, and thus accurately constrains eruption timing, circumventing issues of biasing eruption age by inclusion of inherited/pre-eruption crystal age domains. These data suggest an emplacement interval of ~ 25 ky for the 17 youngest Coso domes, all of which are younger than ~ 100 ka, and shorter-duration emplacement pulses within this age range.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 4
doi: 10.1130/abs/2020CD-347316
© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.