10 Quaternary Volcanism in California (Posters)

Tuesday, 12 May 2020
9:00 AM - 6:00 PM
Fountain Ballroom

U-PB ION MICROPROBE ZIRCON SURFACE DATING OF COBB MOUNTAIN UNITS WITHIN THE CLEAR LAKE VOLCANIC FIELD

Paper number: 10-4
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Authors

Abstract

The Clear Lake Volcanic Field (CLVF) is located approximately 150 km north of San Francisco and is the northernmost and youngest volcanic field in the California Coast Ranges. Episodic volcanic activity from 2.1 Ma to 10 ka generated an eruptive volume of ~100 km3. A shallow magma body known as the Geysers Plutonic Complex (GPC) underlies a portion of the CLVF and supplies heat to the adjacent Geysers steam field. The CLVF is ranked as a high-risk volcanic hazard due to regional seismicity, the presence of the GPC and associated geothermal activity, its long eruptive history, and its proximity to the densely populated Bay Area. Establishing an accurate and comprehensive eruptive history of the CLVF is critical to understanding and better preparing for volcanic hazards associated with the CLVF.

Located along the southernmost edge of the CLVF and directly overlying the GPC, Cobb Mountain is comprised of three volcanic domes: The Alder Creek rhyolite, a commonly used fluence monitor in the 40Ar/39Ar community, the Cobb Mountain rhyodacite, and the Cobb Valley dacite. Cobb Mountain domes are dated by both 40Ar/39Ar on sanidine and U-Pb on zircon interiors, which constrain the timing and eruption interval to ~1.2 Ma and 0.15 ± 0.06 Ma, respectively. The short-duration, globally recognized Cobb Mountain Normal-Polarity geomagnetic excursion is recorded within this emplacement interval and persists between 1.18–1.20 Ma within the reverse polarity Matuyama Chron.

In this contribution, we present ion-microprobe (SHRIMP-RG) U-Pb zircon surface dates on the three units comprising Cobb Mountain. By sampling the outermost, unpolished zircon surface with the ion microprobe, we date the timing of final zircon crystallization prior to eruption. In multiple published cases from other volcanic systems, this protocol is shown to yield dates within uncertainty of eruption age as defined by 40Ar/39Ar analyses. Applying this protocol to zircon from Cobb Mountain units, we (1) further test the accuracy of surface dating by comparing Cobb Mountain U-Pb dates with published 40Ar/39Ar eruption ages on the same units, (2) begin building a comprehensive U-Pb zircon-defined eruption history for the CLVF, and (3) add additional geochronologic constraints to the timing and duration of the Cobb Mountain Cryptochron.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 4

doi: 10.1130/abs/2020CD-347461

© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.