38 Glaciation and Deglaciation along the Southern Margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet II: Bringing Multiple Tools to Bear

Tuesday, 19 May 2020
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Lake Superior Ballroom O

THE INTERLOBATE ZONE BETWEEN THE SAGINAW AND LAKE MICHIGAN LOBES OF THE SOUTHERN LAURENTIDE ICE SHEET (MICHIGAN, U.S.A.)

Paper number: 38-1
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 1:30 PM – 1:50 PM

Authors

Abstract

Unlike many interlobate zones, the interlobate between the Saginaw and Lake Michigan lobes in western Lower Michigan is not an easily-identified, hummocky upland. Rather, topographic expression of the interlobate is broad, complex, and generally low-relief, and was likely formed time-transgressively. This circumstance perhaps explains why the exact location of the interlobate is still unclear. The Saginaw lobe advanced out of the Saginaw Lowlands, west, toward the interlobate and reached its maximum extent early during the MIS-2 glaciation. The Lake Michigan lobe advanced east, out of the Lake Michigan basin to as far east as Newago, Kent, Allegan, and Barry Counties, where it probably over-ran and eventually abutted the retreating Saginaw lobe.

We use a variety of geomorphic data, i.e., landforms, as derived from LiDAR-derived 1-m DEMs, as well as a soils/sediment database and sedimentologic data (till texture and clay mineralogy, recovered on the ground), to reconstruct the extent and dynamics of the Lake Michigan and Saginaw lobe across the region where they interacted. Particularly useful in identifying the interlobate are spatial data of drumlin orientations and esker/tunnel valley paths, because each lobe was spreading out as it flowed toward the interlobate. For example, Saginaw lobe drumlins and streamlined till plains indicate that the ice flow was to the northwest in Mecosta and Montcalm Counties, to the west in Kent County, and to the southwest in Ionia and Barry Counties. Also useful for identifying ice marginal locations (both terminal and recessional) were Saginaw lobe eskers that end in outwash fans. The distribution of kettles and ice contact landforms indicate that the interlobate zone is, in places, a broad zone (>50 km wide) that once contained abundant buried ice. This observation points to widespread ice-marginal stagnation and interaction among the two lobes. A network of southward-flowing channels in this general area appears to indicate a likely (early) interlobate suture zone. The focus of our talk will be on spatial data used to identify the interlobate – one that has not been specifically mapped out until now.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2020NC-347991

© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.