T217 The Unconventional Shale Systems: From Source-Rocks to Reservoirs II

Thursday, 29 October 2020
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Meeting Rooms

LITHOFACIES CLASSIFICATION AND ITS CONTROLS ON THE PORE STRUCTURE DISTRIBUTION IN PERMIAN TRANSITIONAL SHALE IN THE NORTHEASTERN ORDOS BASIN, CHINA

Paper number: T217-25
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 5:05 PM – 5:10 PM

Authors

Abstract

Sea level changes more frequently during the deposition of transitional shale than marine shale, resulting in the strong heterogeneity and instability of the sedimentary environment and making transitional shale gas evaluation difficult. The appropriate identification and classification of shale lithofacies types can improve evaluation of shale reservoirs and can provide the geological basis for the evaluation and potential of shale gas. Previous research focus more on geochemical of organic matter (OM) and mineralogical, petrological and pore structural of transitional shale. However, few studies using lithofacies classification have accurately evaluated the potential of transitional shale. Therefore, the lower Permian Taiyuan and Shanxi shale in the northeastern Ordos Basin is selected as the focus of this research to explain the reservoir characteristics of different lithofacies transitional shale.

Based on the data of X-ray diffraction and division scheme of organic shale cited by previous research, the lower Permian transitional shale in the study area is divided into silty mudstone and muddy siltstone lithofacies. On this basis, combined with the experiment of total organic content, vitrinite reflectance, nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption, and argon ion polishing scanning electron microscopy the differences in the organic geochemical characteristics, pore development characteristics and influencing factors of the shale reservoir in the two lithofacies are compared. The results show that the mean values of w(TOC) and w(Ro) in the muddy siltstone lithofacies are 1.9% and 1.0%, respectively. Siliceous minerals dominate the composition of the rock, and the main types of reservoir spaces are mineral matrix pores, including interparticle (interP) pores and intraparticle (intraP) pores related to inorganic minerals. Macropores and mesopores are the main components of the pore volume, and account for 40.8% and 49.8% of the total volume, respectively. The pore structure is mainly affected by the TOC and siliceous mineral contents. In the silty mudstone lithofacies, the average values of w(TOC) and w(Ro) are 2.4% and 1.2%, respectively. The clay mineral content is relatively high. The main types of reservoir spaces are organic pores and interP pores. Additionally, the pore volumes of macropores, mesopores and micropores are almost the same, accounting for 24.9%, 44.6% and 30.4% of the total pore volume, respectively. The pore structure is mainly affected by the organic matter content and clay mineral content.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2020AM-349042

© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.