T65 3D Printing for Geoscience and Engineering: Emerging Technology in Education, Research, and Communication

Tuesday, 27 October 2020
10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Meeting Rooms

DENSIFICATION APPROACH FOR 3D-PRINTING SANDSTONE ANALOGUES

Paper number: T65-1
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 10:00 AM – 10:15 AM

Authors

Abstract

Geomechanical and transport properties of rocks are of great importance to geoscience and engineering. Typically, experimental programs depend on natural rocks from outcrops or wellbore cores drilled from reservoir formations, which introduce some degree of uncertainty due to the heterogeneous characteristics of rock samples. Binder-jet additive manufacturing (3D-printing) applied to rock models is becoming an emerging technology to characterize natural porous media in a repeatable and homogeneous fashion. As natural rocks that are composed of mineral grains and cement, binder-jet technology offers the capability to manufacture rock analogues with a wide variety of powders, including sand. Silica sand offers the ability to accurately reproduce pore geometry and the resolution to manufacture pore sizes similar to natural sandstones. 3D-printed sandstone analogues, which have similar physical and chemical properties to natural sandstones, allow us to use them in laboratory experiments in substitution for their natural counterpart. This is a promising alternative for experimental testing that can be used to calibrate numerical models in geoscience and engineering. The significance of this approach emerges due to a high interest to match specific geomechanical and transport properties to those in reservoirs. An M-Flex 3D printer (ExOne) located in the GeoPrint facility at the University of Alberta was utilized to 3D-print sandstone analogues. The initial condition of a 3D-printed sandstone shows a loose distribution of grains, and therefore high porosity (~45%) with respect to natural sandstones. In order to replicate more natural rock-like porous media, this study is focused on a densification approach into the 3D-printing rock process. The methodology analyzes a bimodal distribution of sand grain-size, which is a factor that affects packing. It also explores the use of different metal rollers to achieve mechanical compaction of sand layers. Finally, the study presents a map with the optimum printing location inside the job box of the 3D-printer. This map shows a location with coordinates where the specimen is built with more accurate geomechanical and transport properties.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2020AM-354911

© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.