T96 Approaches for Extracting Shear Zone History from the Ductile Rock Record: Probing Their Initiation, Evolution, and Reactivation II

Tuesday, 27 October 2020
5:30 PM - 8:00 PM
Meeting Rooms

PENETRATIVE STRAIN ESTIMATION USING NORMALIZED FRY, RF-Φ AND SHAPE MATRIX EIGENVECTOR METHODS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY FROM EASTERN HIMALAYAN FOLD THRUST BELT

Paper number: T96-8
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 6:35 PM – 6:45 PM

Authors

  • Chirantan Parui Presenting Author
    Indian Institute of Science Education Research Kolkata (IISERK), Mohanpur
  • Jyoti Prasad Das
    Indian Institute of Science Education Research Kolkata (IISERK), Mohanpur
  • Kathakali Bhattacharyya
    Indian Institute of Science Education Research (IISER) Kolkata, Mohanpur, West Bengal

Abstract

Penetrative strain generally decreases from internal to frontal thrust sheets in fold thrust belts (FTB). The normalized Fry and the Rf-φ are two of the most commonly used methods to estimate R (axial ratio) and φ (orientation) of the strain ellipse. In this study, we compare the accuracy of normalized Fry, Rf-φ, and shape matrix eigenvector (SME) methods as a function of lithology, texture, and structural position of the thrust sheets in the FTB. We conduct the study on seven major thrust sheets from two regional transects of Sikkim and far-eastern Arunachal Himalayan FTB. We analyzed 293 thin sections that were cut from 104 quartz-rich sandstone, quartzite, phyllite, schist, and gneiss. 80-120 quartz grains were digitized per thin section using the EllipseFit 3.8.0 software. The central vacancy in the normalized Fry plot was objectively fitted using the enhanced, continuous function method (CFM), and the point-count density (PCD) methods. In each thin section and for every method, we calculate 2σ (95%) uncertainties for R and φ using bootstrap error analysis to understand the goodness of the best-fit strain ellipse. In the internal thrust sheets, R >1.5 (R ~1.6-4.43), and Rf-φ method provides an accurate estimation of the penetrative strain. Results from the SME method also remain consistent with the Rf-φ method. As the grain-to-grain contacts between quartz were low in the studied gneiss, schist, and phyllite of the internal thrusts, the normalized Fry method did not provide a proper central void in most of the samples. The frontal thrust sheets dominantly comprising sandstone and quartzite, and record R <1.5 (R ~1.1-1.3). The Rf-φ plots show high fluctuation (>160°) in the φ values suggesting that initial grain ellipticities were higher than the penetrative strain. At such low strains, the Rf-φ plot strongly distorts the data distribution resulting in unreliable R and φ values. The 2σ uncertainties indicate that the SME and PCD methods provide the lowest errors in the low strain rocks as compared to the enhanced and CFM. SME method assumes initial grain shapes to be ellipsoidal with random orientations, whereas the normalized Fry method assumes initial spherical grains of different sizes. Thus, for low strained rocks, the SME method yields a better estimate of the penetrative strain in the studied rocks.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2020AM-355627

© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.