T99 Ichnology as a Global Proxy Multitool to Reconstruct Biodiversity, Ecology, Hydrology, and Climate in Continental to Marine Settings II

Tuesday, 27 October 2020
5:30 PM - 8:00 PM
Meeting Rooms

THE DURATION AND EXTENT OF ZOOGEOMORPHOLOGY IN ALPINE ENVIRONMENTS

Paper number: T99-1
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 5:30 PM – 5:45 PM

Authors

Abstract

Despite considerable advances in zoogeomorphology over the past 25 years, the geomorphic effects of many organisms are under-documented or unknown. This is problematic when considering the effects of zoogeomorphology on ecological patterns and processes, including duration, depth, and extent of effect on the landscape. Better understanding of these zoogeomorphological activities and their effects on ecosystems is important when considering using this information as proxy for ecosystem or biodiversity reconstruction.

We analyzed the published literature on zoogeomorphology in alpine environments in search of quantitative data regarding the duration and extent of zoogeomorphic effects on the landscape. Our findings revealed the duration (permanence on the landscape) of surficial zoogeomorphic features is unknown for most species, Olympic marmot burrows persist on the landscape for approximately 8-10 years after site abandonment or local extinction. Other zoogeomorphic features are highly ephemeral; for example, gopher "eskers" deposited in snow tunnels and subsequently lowered onto the ground surface by snow melt and ablation typically last only one summer season before the esker sediment is dispersed across the surface and the micro-landform disappears. Findings from the published literature also revealed that although the extent (surface area covered by zoogeomorphic activity) is regularly noted in the literature, scant information exists as to the effects on soil, hydrology, etc. beyond the visual extent of the disturbance. Without additional knowledge of the duration and extent of these features on the landscape, connection to ecological pattern and process, as well as overall biodiversity, becomes less clear, which may complicate using zoogeomorphic features and surrounding vegetation for climate, ecosystem, and biodiversity reconstruction.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2020AM-356485

© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.