T153 Supporting and Advancing Geoscience Education Beyond 2020: Individual, Department, Program, and Institutional-Level Approaches to Student Success II
Wednesday, 28 October 2020
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Meeting Rooms
VISION AND CHANGE: WHAT GRADUATE GEOSCIENCE EDUCATION SHOULD ACCOMPLISH FOR M.S. AND PH.D. GRADUATES
Paper number: T153-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:30 PM – 2:45 PM
Authors
-
Sharon MosherUniversity of Texas at Austin Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, TX
-
Christopher KeaneAmerican Geological Institute, Alexandria, VA
Abstract
The menu of graduate-level critical competencies identified across all geoscience employment sectors aligns strongly with the foundational suite recognized for Bachelor’s students. Problem solving/critical thinking, teamwork/collaboration, leadership skills, and communication with diverse audiences were all identified as key professional skills that geoscience employers expected in their new graduate-level hires. As well, employers placed high value on project management skills, understanding business perspectives, and excellent scientific/professional ethics. In terms of content-focused competencies, employers expect deep core disciplinary knowledge (mastery in M.S. students, and expert-level in Ph.D.'s), the ability to do systems thinking, and extensive quantitative skills, including some computer programming. Employers also put a high priority on abilities in data analytics and data management, skills not stressed in the undergraduate Summit effort, reflecting the rapid growth of “big data” as a part of all geoscience fields. Entry-level graduate geoscientists were viewed as having excellent technical skills, but often lacked in professional competencies, in particular in interpersonal communication and teamwork/collaboration.
In discussing how to better instill professional competencies in MS and Ph.D. graduates, Heads and Chairs saw high value in co-curricular activities (internships, professional development workshops focused on career opportunities, resume writing, interviewing, etc.), and in Individual Development Plans (IDP's) as a means of helping graduate students reflect on their career options and make intentional choices of activities to support their professional ambitions.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2020AM-356653
© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.