T201 From the Micro to Macro in Metamorphic Geology: Constraining Tectono-Metamorphic Processes with High-Resolution Approaches

Thursday, 29 October 2020
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Meeting Rooms

REDUCING UNCERTAINTIES IN ZR-IN-RUTILE THERMOMETRY

Paper number: T201-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:20 PM – 2:35 PM

Authors

Abstract

The Zr-in-rutile thermometer (ZiR) enjoys widespread use, but the effects of different sources of uncertainties in calculated temperatures have not been fully assessed. In addition to calibration uncertainties, variations in Zr concentrations within and among rutile grains raise questions of how to identify composition(s) to use for thermometry. Here we assess temperature uncertainties in the context of new ZiR calibrations (Kohn, 2020; Am Min) and natural Zr variability, and present a method to identify distinct populations of rutile compositions that may be interpreted petrologically and used for more precise ZiR calculations.

New ZiR calibrations have propagated temperature uncertainties of ±20-30 °C (2σ) for an experimental-only dataset calibration, and ±10-15 °C (2σ) for a combined experimental and natural dataset. However, for rocks, how do we choose which rutile composition(s) to use for thermometry? Compositional criteria must be founded on rock-specific petrologic models of rutile stability and compositional equilibration and reequilibration. Nonetheless, many models assume that the maximum Zr concentration likely corresponds most closely with the peak of metamorphism. As discussed by Penniston-Dorland et al. (2018, EPSL), use of either an average of all data or a single highest-Zr measurement will introduce bias. Rather, their “mean-max method” uses either the average of the 4 highest concentrations (if they are each compositionally distinct), or a population of statistically indistinguishable high-Zr concentrations. To help identify single distinct populations from the total distribution of Zr concentrations in rutile, we have applied the generic IsoPlotR function Peakfit (Vermeesch, 2018, Geosci Front; analogous to the Unmix routine in IsoPlot, Ludwig, 2012, Berkeley Geochron) to identify distinct sub-populations, their mean values, and their corresponding standard errors. Applying Peakfit to rutile data can readily resolve a set of analytically indistinguishable high-Zr concentrations, in some cases yielding precisions as small as ±5 °C. Peakfit can be applied to any 1-D dataset, e.g., to identify maximum inclusion pressures from measurements of Raman spectra to calculate maximum entrapment pressures, minimum zircon U-Pb ages to identify likely eruption ages, etc.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2020AM-357491

© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.