T259 Making Sense of Methodologies and Theoretical Frameworks in Geoscience Education Research

Friday, 30 October 2020
10:00 AM - 2:00 PM
Meeting Rooms

EXPLORING THE SPATIAL ABILITY OF UNDERGRADUATES AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC

Paper number: T259-17
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 1:35 PM – 1:45 PM

Authors

Abstract

Spatial thinking has been linked to performance in STEM and the geosciences, especially in academic settings. However, few studies have explored how trends in primary and secondary school and undergraduate institutions manifest in experiences and career choices post-academia. Our theoretical framework is spatial thinking is malleable and can change depending on the experiences and training one has had. The purpose of this study was to explore the spatial thinking skills of the general public to elucidate connections between education, career, and demographic factors and their scores on a spatial assessment. We utilized the validated Spatial Reasoning Instrument by Ramful et al. (2017) to assess respondent mental rotation, spatial orientation, and spatial visualization skills (Cronbach’s alpha=0.83). In addition to these items, we created and validated 14 additional items to assess respondent spatial confidence, experiences and perspectives (Cronbach’s alpha=0.88). The assessment was distributed to the general adult population (N=981) located in the United States using a population of workers from Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTURK). We also compared the spatial assessment performance of these participants to undergraduate students (N=567) using the same spatial assessment, and we will present how these two groups performed differently. We will also present the results of a regression analysis on the general public sample that determined which factors we collected (e.g., gender, spatial experience, age, major, career, etc.) have the largest impact on spatial assessment performance. This study contributes to research that emphasizes the transfer of spatial skills from education to career and how experiences after graduation continue to shape spatial thinking outcomes.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2020AM-357790

© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.