T13 Sigma Gamma Epsilon Student Research (Posters)

Monday, 26 October 2020
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Meeting Rooms

EVALUATION OF LENGTH AND AZIMUTH MEASUREMENT DATA USING EIGHT GIS BASEMAPS: TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS ARE STILL THE STANDARD

Paper number: T13-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:10 PM – 2:20 PM

Authors

Abstract

ArcGIS online (AGOL) has a variety of basemaps to use for remote visualization and analysis. With numerous basemap options, choosing the best for data collection is fundamental. Different types of basemaps may affect how we perceive three-dimensional objects (Phillips et al., 1975); thereby, affecting the precision of data collected. This project focused on the length and azimuth data of 60 drumlins in Western, NY from four different, AGOL-provided basemaps: a) USA Topographic, b) default hillshade, c) Terrain, and d) USGS Topographic. In addition, we generated two parallel-to-strike and two perpendicular-to-strike hillshades (n=4) to evaluate shading effect on data collection. Data extracted from line drawings (n=480) was used to calculate the mean length (1,662m, ±529) and azimuth (171°, ±0.3). Testing these data for uniformity across basemaps determined if any basemap is less reliable for data collection. Two sample t-tests and linear regression tests were used for comparison. The results showed no significant differences between the length or azimuth data from different basemaps, but the Terrain map showed the lowest statistic values, particularly versus the hillshade from a direction of 351° (t(59) = 1.84, p = .007, R2 = 0.4116). At 351o, illumination is parallel to the long axis of the drumlin, hits the non-tapered end and causes the tapered tail to visually disappear into the shadow. When using a hillshade map to analyze asymmetric landforms, a poorly selected direction of shading may be less accurate for analysis due to the visual loss of part of the landform. Seeing the entire landform outline is critical for measurement data. The USA Topographic map, which has defined outlines of landforms, was best for data collection and had the least number of differences versus the USGS Topographic map (t(59) = -0.01, p = .992, R2 = 0.9412). While there are benefits to using hillshade maps to visualize topographic relief, the more traditional USA/USGS Topographic map is better for measurements of length and orientation due to the more established outline of landforms and less visual variability. USA/USGS Topographic maps have historically been, and continue to be, the standard, reliable basemap for many fields, and, shown by the results of this project, may be the best option for remote measurement and analysis.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2020AM-358059

© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.