236 D5. Geochronology
Friday, 30 October 2020
10:00 AM - 2:00 PM
Meeting Rooms
DETRITAL APATITE U-PB AGES AND TRACE AND RARE EARTH ELEMENT GEOCHEMISTRY RECORD CA. 100 MA CRUSTAL THICKENING IN THE SOUTHERN ANDES
Paper number: 236-4
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 10:45 AM – 11:00 AM
Authors
-
Brian K. HortonThe University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
-
Brian K. HortonUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
-
Julie FosdickStorrs, CT
-
Gilby JepsonUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
-
Rebecca A. VanderLeestOberlin College, Oberlin, OH
Abstract
Previous work on the same samples yields cosmopolitan zircon U-Pb age spectra (with peaks between 1200–80 Ma, and limited 70-40 Ma ages). Despite the diversity of zircon U-Pb dates, apatite U-Pb dates yield remarkably consistent ages, tightly clustered between ca. 110-85 Ma (207Pb discordia-based correction). Within the seemingly unimodal apatite dates, geochemical discriminators resolve the presence of at least two contemporaneous but geochemically distinct apatite populations, derived from primary igneous and thermally perturbed sources respectively. Tightly clustered apatite U-Pb ages temporally overlap a number of independent proxies for mid-Cretaceous crustal thickening including: (1) an increase in U/Th ratios in detrital zircon, (2) onset of coarse-clastic sedimentation in the Magallanes-Austral foreland basin, (3) structural restorations, and (4) an increase in Sr/Y and La/Yb from compiled whole rock geochemistry. We propose that the most likely reason for the lack of detrital apatite populations older than ca. 110 Ma is due to a regional thermal perturbation related to the onset of crustal thickening. If true, crustal thickening drove high heat flow and thermally reset pre-100 Ma apatite while crystallizing new igneous apatite during pluton emplacement. Finally, apatite show elevated La/Yb ratios at ca. 100 Ma, hinting at the potential to use apatite geochemistry and U-Pb ages to reconstruct changes in crustal thickness.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 52, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2020AM-358755
© Copyright 2020 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.