18 D5. Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, and Paleontology

Monday, 15 March 2021
1:30 PM - 5:50 PM
Portland


A COMPARISON OF SEDIMENT GEOCHEMISTRY FROM ABOVE AND BELOW A TIDAL RESTRICTION IN THE BACK RIVER CREEK MARSH, WOOLWICH, ME

Paper number: 18-20
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 5:30 PM – 5:40 PM


Authors


Abstract

This study examines the geochemistry of sediment cores collected from above and below the approximately 150-year-old Dike Road and Route 1 tidal restriction across the Back River Creek Marsh (BRCM) in Woolwich, ME. Two 1 m long sediment cores were collected north of the restriction, one 1 m core was collected south of the restriction, and a fourth core was taken downstream at a reference site. Sediments were described visually and analyzed for Pb concentration, carbon content, and stable carbon isotope composition. The Pb concentrations were highest at 24 cm below the surface; assuming this reflects the onset of the phasing out of leaded gasoline in the US starting in the 1970s, average sediment deposition rates are estimated to be 0.5 cm/year north of the restriction. The carbon concentrations were higher north of the restriction than south of the restriction, reflecting the current ecosystems in place; organic rich Typha sp. wetlands dominate the system north of the restriction, and sparsely vegetated tidal flats are present south of the restriction. The δ13C values from all the cores range between -24‰ and -30‰, falling well within the typical C3 plant range, thus indicating a freshwater or grassland setting across the entire marsh since the late 1700s. Significant carbon and nitrogen isotope shifts occur in the early 2000s reflecting the establishment of current wetlands and shifts in nitrogen cycling immediately after partial tidal flow restoration with the removal of a tide gate and the addition of a new culvert by Bath Iron Works. This study provides important baseline information on the nature of the marsh prior to the building of Route 1 tidal restriction and is useful for evaluating recent and future restoration efforts.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 1

doi: 10.1130/abs/2021NE-361683

© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.