17 Ultramafic and Mafic Magmatism
Tuesday, 20 April 2021
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Missouri State University- Geography and Geology MS Program Room
BILLOWED STRUCTURES OF BASALTIC INTRUSIONS: A COMPARISON OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK, TEXAS AND 71 GULCH, IDAHO
Paper number: 17-10
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 10:30 AM – 10:40 AM
Authors
-
Alison GraettingerUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
-
Alex BeardenUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
Abstract
To characterize the diversity of the billowed structures, a classification system has been developed utilizing 21 SFM-derived high-resolution 3D models of exposed billowed intrusions across both locations. Measurements from SFM-derived models were compared with field measurements to test the validity of each model and to analyze geometries of the structure types. Six structure types were recognized: linear, sinuous, teardrop, bulbous, circular, and overprinted. A total of 131 structures were documented at BBNP and 87 were identified at 71G. Model measurements reveal that despite the difference in formation depth at each site, the dimensions of the billows and the quantity of each structure types are similar. Amplitude measurements range from 1-34 cm (mean: 6 cm) at BBNP and from 1-39 cm (mean: 8 cm) at 71G. Wavelength measurements range from 5-110 cm (mean: 20 cm) at BBNP and from 6-72 cm (mean: 24 cm) at 71G. Bulbous structures are most common across both sites, representing 46% of the structure type population at BBNP and 51% at 71G. Linear structures are the second-most common at both sites but were more common at BBNP (32%) than at 71G (17%). The remaining structure types are minor in population, representing a combined 22% at BBNP and combined 32% at 71G.
Formation of the billowed structures is likely due to the cooling of intruding magma while experiencing interfacial instabilities. The structures may represent different phases of the instability interaction. Each site hosts multiple structure types, no one structure type is dependent on another, and dimensions of the structure types are similar at both sites, suggesting that depth is not a major influence in the occurrence of different structure types.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 3
doi: 10.1130/abs/2021NC-362762
© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.