15 The Kinematics, Dynamics, and Surface Expression of Faults within the Walker Lane–Eastern California Shear Zone, Nevada and Eastern California: Improving Hazard Forecasts and Long-Term Slip Histories

Friday, 14 May 2021
8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
UNR Dept of Geological Sciences & Engineering Room

COMPREHENSIVE MAPPING OF ACTIVE FAULTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2019 RIDGECREST EARTHQUAKE RUPTURES

Paper number: 15-3
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 9:10 AM – 9:30 AM

Authors

Abstract

The area surrounding the July 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence in southeastern California had not been comprehensively examined for active faults prior to those earthquakes. No long continuous fault lines were recognized along the 2019 ruptures beforehand, and only ~35% of the rupture occurred on previously mapped faults. We present a new map of active faults in the region for integration into the USGS Quaternary Fault and Fold Database and California Active Fault Map, based on the observed 2019 ruptures and on active tectonic features recognized in the landscape. We identified these features—tufa lineaments, sheared Quaternary deposits, scarps, deflected drainages, and lineaments and contrasts in topography, vegetation, and ground color—using pre-event high-resolution (<2 m) topography and optical imagery in combination with post-event field observations. These features reveal a network of NE- and NW-trending orthogonal fault strands, a subset of which ruptured in 2019. Neotectonic features are commonly short (<2 km), discontinuous, and display en echelon stepping patterns along both the M6.4 and M7.1 ruptures. Faults are generally better expressed outside the late Pleistocene lake basins and in areas where substantial vertical motion occurred in 2019. Both the NE- and NW-trending active fault systems are subparallel to regional bedrock fabrics that were established as early as ~150 Ma, and may be reactivating these older structures. Overall, we estimate that 50–70% of the 2019 surface ruptures could have been recognized as active faults with detailed inspection of pre-event data. Similar detailed mapping of potential neotectonic features could help improve seismic hazard analyses in other regions of the Walker Lane – Eastern California Shear Zone and elsewhere where faulting is distributed or incompletely mapped. Given the distributed features but observed continuity of rupture, we recommend that in areas where a fault cannot be resolved as a single throughgoing structure, a zone of potential faulting, in addition to or instead of a representative proxy fault, should be used as a hazard model input. This is necessary to adequately represent potential structural coherency and connectivity that may permit larger and more variable earthquake ruptures than would be allowed in a more simplified model.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 4

doi: 10.1130/abs/2021CD-362979

© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.