T92 Coastal Storm Impacts in Times of Changing Climate and Sea Levels: Geological Records, Historic Perspectives, and Forecasting (Posters)
Monday, 11 October 2021
9:00 AM - 1:00 PM
Exhibit Hall A
THE ARCUATE GEOMETRY OF ONSLOW BAY, NORTH CAROLINA, ITS INFLUENCE ON HURRICANE-INDUCED MICROSEISMS, AND POTENTIAL RELATIONS TO COASTAL PROCESSES
Paper number: T92-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 1:00 PM
Authors
-
Jessica WhiteThe University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN
Abstract
Hurricanes Matthew and Dorian followed similar tracks and took approximately 6 to 7 hours to traverse the long axis of Onslow Bay, from SW to NE, as category 1 hurricanes on Oct. 8 and 9, 2016, and on Sept. 6, 2019. Hurricane Florence took approximately 7 hours for a shorter, E to W, traverse of the Bay on September 14, 2018, as a category 2 hurricane.
Secondary (double-frequency) microseisms (SM) generated by these hurricanes were measured in Chattanooga, TN, using a Guralp CMG-6TD broadband seismometer. SM spectra for all three hurricanes, measured on the vertical axis, ranged from 0.12 to 0.50 Hz (2.0 to 8.3 s period) with peak power at 0.19 to 0.26 Hz (3.8 to 5.3 s dominant period).
Matthew's SM weakened from -106 dB to -109 dB (relative to velocity) while in Onslow Bay and reintensified to -106 dB upon leaving the Bay, before it went to sea as a post-tropical cyclone. Similarly, Dorian's SM weakened from -110 dB to -112 dB while in the Bay, and reintensified to -110 dB upon leaving the Bay, before it raced to Nova Scotia. Florence's SM strengthened to -104 dB as it approached Onslow Bay from the SE, perpendicular to the coastline. Once in the Bay, the storm slowed, turned to the W, and waned from a category 2 to a category 1 hurricane. While in the Bay, its SM weakened from -104 dB to -106 dB, but only briefly (2 hours). It reintensified to -104 dB before the storm made landfall at Wrightsville Beach.
While these hurricanes passed near the center of Onslow Bay, storm circulation was approximately tangential to much of the Bay’s arcuate shoreline, resulting in reduced reflected wave energy, reduced double-frequency standing-wave pressure oscillations, and the observed temporary weakening of SM. Under these circumstances, weakened SM may signify changes to the energy budget of wave-related coastal processes and enhanced alongshore sediment transport.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2021AM-365017
© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.