T60 Young Investigators in Mineralogy and Crystallography (Posters)

Sunday, 10 October 2021
2:30 PM - 6:30 PM
Exhibit Hall A

EXPERIMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ON ZIRCONIUM STABLE ISOTOPE FRACTIONATION DURING MAGMATIC ZIRCON CRYSTALLIZATION

Paper number: T60-3
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:30 PM – 6:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

Zirconium (Zr) belongs to a group of transition metals known as the High Field Strength Elements (HFSE), which, due to their distinctive geochemical properties, are widely used to trace magmatic differentiation as well as the co-evolution of Earth's mantle and crust [e.g., 1, 2]. Although mass-independent isotopic variations of Zr have been extensively studied [e.g., 3, 4], only recently have mass-dependent variations begun to be explored [e.g., 5, 6, 7, 8]. These investigations have debated whether magmatic zircon crystallization can drive equilibrium stable isotope fractionation given that Zr4+ undergoes a shift in coordination state (from 6- to 8-fold) as zircon precipitates from a silicic melt. Although Zr measurements from natural systems have confirmed significant 𝛿94/90Zr variability, ab initio calculations predict negligible equilibrium fractionation between zircon and melt at magmatic temperatures, and therefore the exact mechanism(s) fractionating Zr stable isotopes remain unclear [9, 10]. To resolve this debate, we determined isotopic fractionation coefficients between zircon and silicic melt as a function of temperature and melt composition using controlled zircon-growth experiments. Our preliminary data show that the observed range of natural variability is not well explained by equilibrium isotope fractionation during zircon crystallization. This supports the hypothesis of a kinetic origin of isotopic fractionations during magma crystallization [9, 10].

References:

[1] Weyer, S.,et al., Chem. Geol., 2002, 187(3-4), 295-313.

[2] Pfänder, J. A., et al., EPSL, 2007, 254(1-2), 158-172.

[3] Münker, C., et al., Science, 2000, 289(5484), 1538-1542.

[4] Schönbächler, M., et al., EPSL, 2003, 216(4), 467–481.

[5] Ibañez-Mejia, M. & Tissot, F.L.H., Sci Adv, 2019, 5, eaax8648.

[6] Inglis, E. C., et al., GCA, 2019, 250, 311-323.

[7] Tompkins, H. G., et al., JAAS, 2020, 35(6), 1167-1186.

[8] Guo, J. L., et al., PNAS, 2020, 117(35), 21125-21131.

[9] Chen, X., et al., ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 2020, 4(9), 1572–1595.

[10] Méheut, M., et al., GCA, 2021, 292, 217–234.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2021AM-368502

© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.