T20 Solving Paleoenvironmental Problems with Isotopes: New Advances and Ongoing Challenges in Soils and Geoarchaeology

Sunday, 10 October 2021
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Portland Ballroom 253 (Hybrid Room)

INTERPRETING STABLE CARBON ISOTOPE PROFILES OF ORGANIC MATTER IN SOILS

Paper number: T20-13
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 11:00 AM – 11:20 AM

Authors

Abstract

The δ13C values of soil organic matter (SOM) typically increase with depth in well-drained soils. A widely accepted explanation for this trend is that isotopic fractionation during decomposition (εCO2-SOM) results in preferential loss of 12C as CO2 and retention of 13C in the soil. Topsoil incubations, however, have shown that values of εCO2-SOM are too small or of the wrong sign to explain down-profile trends. These observations could be reconciled if 1) fractionation during respiration of recalcitrant carbon is larger than that for labile carbon observed in topsoil incubations, 2) microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) is small allowing for microbes to preferentially concentrate 13C and simultaneously generate CO2 with δ13C values similar to the carbon they consume, and/or 3) the effect of rising atmospheric PCO2 on C3 plant δ13C values is accounted for. To explore these possibilities, we used a three-pool soil carbon model. We parameterize the model with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo Metropolis-Hastings approach using organic carbon concentrations and 14C activities from soils in Great Mountain Forest (GMF), CT. Prior distributions for parameters were defined by ranges of values from the literature. We then ran simulations with εCO2-SOM for the rapid pool prescribed to a small range consistent with the results from topsoil incubations (-0.9 to +0.6‰) to investigate possibilities 1 and 2. In another set of simulations, we prescribed εCO2-SOM for the slow and stable pools at 0‰ and imposed empirical CO2 records in order to account for possibility 3. We find that the PCO2 effect explains the down-profile δ13C trend at GMF. Furthermore, magnitudes of εCO2-SOM for the three pools (calibrated while simultaneously considering the PCO2 effect) are small and of opposing signs (-0.02‰ to +0.08‰) suggesting that if GMF tree δ13C values responded primarily to PCO2 over the past 150 years then overall carbon isotope fractionation during decomposition is probably small. Alternatively, in the absence of the PCO2 effect, a larger value of εCO2-SOM during respiration of slow carbon (-0.6‰) or CUEs of 15-25% along with small εCO2-SOM (-0.2‰) for all pools explain the observations. Separation of these possibilities requires additional measurements such as microbial CUEs and δ13C values of tree rings and of microbially-respired CO2.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2021AM-368763

© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.