T178 Life's Innovations from the Early Earth to the Search on Modern Mars I: Honoring the Career of Andrew H. Knoll

Tuesday, 12 October 2021
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Portland Ballroom 255 (Hybrid Room)

EUKARYOTES WERE LIKELY AEROBIC AND ESTABLISHED IN PROTEROZOIC ECOSYSTEMS

Paper number: T178-4
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:15 PM – 2:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

The collective evidence available for the early evolutionary history of eukaryotes is not always aligned. Most critically, the body fossil record and molecular clock predictions suggest a Paleoproterozoic or Mesoproterozoic origin of eukaryotes, yet there is a lack of eukaryotic biomarkers until the Neoproterozoic. Some have argued that the Proterozoic biomarker record shows a late appearance of steranes because eukaryotic organisms were a minor part of global ecosystems relative to bacteria, and thus their signal was swamped by bacterial biomarkers. Others have argued that early stem-group eukaryotes may have lived only or mainly in anoxic environments, thus leaving behind no sterol record, and that crown-group eukaryotes thus evolved relatively late. We argue that combined evidence from fossils, geochemical records, and phylogenetic analyses are best interpreted to suggest that eukaryotes were aerobic, diverse, and well-established in early to mid Proterozoic ecosystems. In addition, modern understandings of microbial ecosystems suggest that even low concentrations of eukaryotic biomass can have a large impact on marine communities. We must closely examine and integrate both biological and geological evidence and examine points of agreement and contention to move towards a comprehensive understanding of the history of the eukaryotic lineage. Indeed, it is in these apparent disagreements that we gain new insights into the true origin and early evolutionary history of this vastly important and diverse group. This work follows on Andy Knoll’s seminal research on early eukaryotic ecosystems and his ongoing efforts to more fully integrate biological and geological perspectives on Earth-life co-evolution.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2021AM-369878

© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.