T105 Cephalopods Present and Past: Evolution, Paleoecology, and Links to Paleoenvironmental Change

Monday, 11 October 2021
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
E141/E142 (Hybrid Room)

THE ADAPTIVE VALUE OF HETEROMORPHY IN AMMONOID CEPHALOPODS

Paper number: T105-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:20 PM – 2:40 PM

Authors

Abstract

Heteromorph ammonoids are characterized by their unique modes of conch coiling that deviate from “typical” planispiral forms. Some morphologies are quite bizarre, obscuring their modes of life and ecology. These seemingly aberrant forms have even been used as examples of typolysis (pre-programmed degeneration) by early researchers. While the concept of typolysis is no longer accepted, the adaptive value of many heteromorphs has remained elusive. However, recent advances in computer modeling, simulation, and model fabrication provide new context for the functional morphology of heteromorphs. A broad range of examined morphotypes have the capacity for neutral buoyancy (or nearly so). Hydrostatic simulations demonstrate that most heteromorphs were more stable than extant Nautilus (a frequently used, but imperfect modern analogue to ammonoids). Under these conditions, the static orientation assumed by living heteromorphs would have been somewhat fixed, which strongly influences interactions with their surroundings and the directional efficiency of propulsive locomotion. Many heteromorphs (e.g., nostoceratids, scaphitids, ancyloceratids, and others) exhibit a final stage of coiling that resembles a U-shaped hook. This common adult modification consistently produces upward-facing postures and increased hydrostatic stability while simultaneously aligning the thrust direction for efficient horizontal movement at maturity. Furthermore, certain modes of coiling (e.g., helical; vermiconic) improve rotational capabilities about the vertical axis. Most heteromorphs are poorly streamlined, suggesting they were not well suited for rapid movement (with a few exceptions, like orthocones). Instead, hydrostatics were likely primary selective drivers behind these bizarre conch morphologies, which manage or change certain physical properties throughout ontogeny.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2021AM-370014

© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.