T176 Stratigraphy, Stasis, and Shales II

Tuesday, 12 October 2021
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
E143/E144

AVOIDING PITFALLS IN PCA FOR DESCRIBING TAPHONOMY: REFINING THE CHEMOSPACE APPROACH

Paper number: T176-6
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:40 PM – 2:55 PM

Authors

Abstract

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is an incredibly useful exploratory statistical tool that allows researchers to determine vectors of high variance within their data. Over the last decade, PCA has become widely used across paleontological subdisciplines including morphometrics, paleoecology, and most recently taphonomy. With regard to the latter, PCA has become a prominent method to parse out preservational chemistry of a fossil in a “chemospace” using various forms of spectroscopic data (Colleary et al, 2015, McCoy et al, 2019, Selly et al, 2017). Given its wider use, it is necessary to assess potential fine-tuning adjustments that could make this methodology more effective for evaluating fossil materials.

Here we discuss three scenarios that require methodological adjustments to the PCA to produce useful and interpretable results. First, proportional data, such as data produced by , requires specific transformations before applying PCA to account for the inherent non-negative and constant sum constraints in the data. Second, in the case of performing PCA before supervised learning methods (e.g., classification, clustering), samples of unknown group membership should be excluded when performing PCA to avoid including variance from the out-of-sample data and to improve model generalizability. In the particular case of classification or clustering, it is advisable to use a secondary method beyond PCA to conclude group membership. Lastly, certain spectroscopy methods, such as Raman, can introduce unwanted noise with heterogeneous geologic samples, for example, fossil samples that contain a mixture of mineral and organic materials that can produce overlapping vibrational signals. While PCA is a valid technique to characterize the nature of these spectra, there is a question of how noise can influence the resulting principal components and thus the final interpretations. Here, we test a set of known, generated spectra with varying levels of noise to evaluate the effectiveness of PCA in describing the material.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2021AM-370762

© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.