T231 Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes: Geologic, Geophysical, and Modeling Constraints on Rupture Timing and Process
Wednesday, 13 October 2021
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Portland Ballroom 257 (Hybrid Room)
PROPAGATOR WAKES OF THE JUAN DE FUCA PLATE - ARE THEY WEAKER OR STRONGER THAN THE SURROUNDING OCEANIC CRUST?
Paper number: T231-14
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 4:40 PM – 4:55 PM
Authors
-
Asif Ashraf Presenting AuthorUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Lincoln, NE
-
Irina FilinaUniversity of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Abstract
We performed 2.75D gravity modeling along the same seismic profiles and arrived at an opposite conclusion. Our modeling suggests that the propagator wakes correspond to zones of lower density than the surrounding oceanic crust. This disagreement relates to the difference in the modeling approaches. Our 2.75D modeling allowed us to incorporate gravity signals from nearby seamounts - both exposed (bathymetric) and buried ones imaged by the vintage seismic data. The seamounts were not directly crossed by the modeled lines but were in the vicinity, so their up to 5 mGal gravity signal should be properly accounted for. In addition, a general increase in density of the oceanic crust away from the spreading center must be included in the model to explain observed gravity data.
Our results suggest that the densities within the propagator wakes are up to 0.05 g/cc lower than the ones of the surrounding oceanic crust which we interpret as evidence of crustal weakness within the propagator wakes related to faulting during the formation of those features. This conclusion is consistent with variations in crustal thickness within propagator wakes documented by other researchers. We postulate these weaker crustal zones facilitate the formation of seamounts that cluster near the propagator wakes. However, the spatial and temporal distribution of seamounts with respect to propagator wakes require further investigations.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2021AM-370842
© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.