T151 Mountain Glaciation and Climate Change of the Past and Present (Posters)
Tuesday, 12 October 2021
9:00 AM - 1:00 PM
Exhibit Hall A
GLACIAL MAPPING IN THE ARID PIONEER MOUNTAINS, MONTANA: ASSESSING PALEO-ELAS DURING THE LAST GLACIAL MAXIMUM
Paper number: T151-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 1:00 PM
Authors
-
Mana M. BryantUniversity of Montana Western, Dillon, MT
-
Spruce W. SchoenemannUniversity of Montana Western, Dillon, MT
-
Lee CorbettUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, VT
-
Paul R. BiermanUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, VT
Abstract
In order to better visualize glacial features remotely, we carried out a series of drone surveys to create DEM (digital elevation model) maps and orthophotos of our sample locations. The high-resolution aerial imagery greatly assisted in identifying subtle glacial landforms (e.g., debris flows, recessional moraines, and stagnant ice areas) and the relative position of boulders we sampled for dating. The detailed geomorphic mapping work will provide insight for interpreting ongoing and future cosmogenic exposure dating of the moraine boulders and improved interpretation of the maximum glacial extent and retreat timing.
The semi-arid climate of southwest Montana has preserved many geomorphic features of the last glaciation. Our work focuses on three valleys: Birch Creek, Canyon Creek, and Dingley Creek. They were selected based on different factors such as aspect, shading, valley size, precipitation, and weather patterns that could influence the growth and/or decay of the glaciers as well as their response to regional climatic changes.
In order to reconstruct the past dimensions of these glaciers, we used several methods of determining the equilibrium line altitude (ELA); including the AABR (area-altitude balance ratio) and the AAR (accumulation area ratio). For example, the paleo ELA reconstructed using AABR for the Birch Creek valley is 2577 m, for Canyon Creek 2651 m, and for Dingley Creek 2608 m. The average paleo ELA was 2612 m (AABR) and 2580 m (AAR), respectively. The difference between the AABR and AAR methods was minimal (~30m), with the AABR method generally higher.
Results from this work will advance the understanding of how current glaciers in the coldest, driest regions of the world may respond to temperature increases and precipitation changes.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2021AM-371284
© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.