Geological Society of America

3 Exploring Opportunities for Carbon Management through CO2 Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS)

Monday, 14 March 2022
8:30 AM - 10:40 AM
Online

A WORKFLOW FOR DOWN-SELECTING A CCS SITE

Paper number: 3-3
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 9:20 AM

Authors

Ramon Trevino Presenting Author
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Susan Hovorka
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Tucker F. Hentz
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Dallas B. Dunlap
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Shuvajit Bhattacharya
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Michael V. DeAngelo
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Harold Rogers
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Sarah M. Prentice
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Amanda L. Merida
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

Abstract

The Gulf of Mexico (GoM) Basin has widely-recognized potential to participate in the emerging low carbon economy. Many GoM coastal carbon-intensive industries (e.g., petrochemicals, LNG, etc.) require decarbonizing via capture. Fortunately, the geologic section provides many opportunities to store captured CO₂. In order to obtain a Class VI EPA permit for injecting non-EOR-related CO₂into deep saline reservoirs, the geologic section must be well-characterized and understood. Based on several studies, including one in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, we provide a workflow designed to yield permit-ready locations that can accept and store large volumes of CO₂ for significant time periods. Arguably, one of the most important decision points in the workflow is identification and qualification of a storage complex for geologic storage. Along most of the Texas coast, both onshore and offshore, the Miocene age geologic section is most prospective because it is generally below the minimum depth for dense-phase CO₂ and above the depth to over-pressure. Ubiquitous potential storage reservoirs (e.g., barrier-bar and deltaic depositional systems) and confining systems are identified in the Miocene section. The depositional systems are interpreted from well log character and mapping sand body geometry. The geologic structural interpretation includes mapping faults on available 2-D and 3-D seismic and inferring regional extent. Whole core is planned to calibrate conversion of log-based porosity to permeability in the Miocene of this region, as well as confirm the low permeability of fine-grained zones (e.g., marine mudstones). Critical characteristics of the storage complex include 1) lateral continuity of flow units across facies trends and across faults, 2) recharge of shallow aquifers with brine from saline mudflats leading to absence of a fresh groundwater resource, and 3) relatively shallow occurrence of overpressure that locally limits the depth of the injection window.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 1

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022SC-373658

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.