T5 Metals in Hydrothermal Systems: From Source to Sink

Sunday, 9 October 2022
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Mile High Ballroom 4C


NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IRON OXIDE - COPPER - GOLD (IOCG) AND IRON OXIDE - APATITE (IOA) DEPOSITS IN THE ANDEAN MARGIN

Paper number: T5-3
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:25 AM – 8:45 AM


Authors

  • Adam Simon Presenting Author
    University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Abstract

Iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) and iron oxide-apatite (IOA) deposits are commonly spatially and temporally associated with one another, and with coeval magmatism. IOCG deposits have similar Cu grades and tonnages as porphyry-Cu deposits but are distinguished by having significantly less total sulfur and lacking stockwork quartz veins. In many districts, field observations reveal that IOCG mineralization transitions with depth to S-Cu-Au-poor IOA mineralization, and/or that IOA mineralization transitions laterally to IOCG mineralization. Here, we use trace element concentrations in magnetite and pyrite, Fe and O stable isotope abundances of magnetite and hematite, H isotopes of magnetite-hosted fluid inclusions and actinolite, and S in pyrite from IOCG and IOA deposits in Chile and Peru to develop a new genetic model that explains IOCG and IOA deposits as a continuum produced by a combination of igneous and magmatic-hydrothermal processes. The δ18O, Δ17O, δ56Fe, δD and δ34S data unequivocally fingerprint a silicate magma as the source of the ore fluid in Andean IOCG and IOA deposits. Magnetite-hosted silicate melt inclusions and aqueous fluid inclusions, along with magnetite trace element compositions, reveal crystallization from silicate melt and magmatic-hydrothermal fluid. The trace element abundances of magnetite and pyrite, and Mg-in-magnetite and Fe# actinolite thermometry, reveal a systematic continuum between IOA and IOCG deposits that is consistent with formation from a cooling magmatic-hydrothermal fluid. The compositional variability of actinolite in IOCG systems indicates that at least two separate magmatic-hydrothermal fluids were involved in mineralization. The first fluid was responsible for the massive and disseminated magnetite, actinolite and Cu-poor sulfides, whereas the second fluid precipitated additional magnetite and actinolite along with Cu-Fe-sulfides. The data are consistent with a model that invokes a magmatic-hydrothermal ore fluid that evolves an intermediate to intermediate-mafic silicate melt and ascends along pre-existing faults into the ore deposition environment owing to regional tectonic stress changes.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-377842

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.