T100 Best Student Geologic Mapping Competition (Posters)
Monday, 10 October 2022
9:00 AM - 1:00 PM
Exhibit Hall F
NEW GEOLOGIC MAPPING IN THE ARCTIC D-1 SW and NW 7.5’ QUADRANGLES, NORTHEASTERN BROOKS RANGE, ALASKA
Paper number: T100-1
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 1:00 PM
Authors
-
George GeierDartmouth College, Hanover, NH
-
Michelle FameDartmouth College, Hanover, NH
-
Emma KroegerDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Anderson, SC
-
Lyle L. NelsonCarleton University, Ottawa, ON
-
Christopher ConnorsWashington and Lee University, Lexington, VA
-
Justin StraussDartmouth College, Hanover, NH
-
Bill McClellandUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Abstract
The felsic member of the Double Mountain complex is exposed in a bimodal volcanic center that dominates the central portion of the map area. Lithologies include metamorphosed rhyolitic crystal tuff and massive rhyolite with local flow banding and/or columnar jointing, and volcaniclastic layers. Brosgé et al. (2001) mapped a Devonian rhyolite unit ‘Dr’ distinct from other volcanics, ‘PzV’. We observed that these Dr units reflect intense quartz-sericite-pyrite alteration rather than a distinct protolith and thus abandon use of the Dr unit. The mafic member consists of dikes and sills within the complex. The shale member includes chlorite-rich phyllite and mudstone interbedded with thin layers of lithic arenite and wacke. The informal Chandalar unit overlies the complex on a prominent angular unconformity and includes interbedded lithic (chert) arenite and wacke, shale, siltstone, quartz arenite, and minor polymictic conglomerate. The Double Mountain complex and Chandalar unit are structurally overlain by the Kayak Shale and Lisburne Group. The Brookian thrust fault separating these units defines a shallowly plunging antiform with the volcanic and clastic units exposed in a structural window. This implies that the Endicott Mountain Allocthon (EMA) thrust sheet is more far-travelled here than previously thought, and the frontal EMA thrust likely terminates in the Arctic D-1 NW quadrangle rather than in Arctic D-1 SW quadrangle. Additional field mapping and geochronologic and geochemical analyses will help establish the magmatic setting of the Double Mountain complex and test links to adjacent Arctic terranes.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-378097
© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.