T242 Integrative Perspectives on Morphological Change: Shaping Our Understanding of the Fossil Record (Posters)

Wednesday, 12 October 2022
9:00 AM - 1:00 PM
Exhibit Hall F

DIAGNOSTIC TOOTH MORPHOLOY OF MESOHIPPUS AND MIOHIPPUS: A CASE FOR SYNONOMIZATION

Paper number: T242-6
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 1:00 PM

Authors

  • Carolyn Kocken Presenting Author
    South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD
  • Carolyn Kocken Presenting Author
    University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
  • Darrin Pagnac
    South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD

Abstract

Distinguishing the Oligocene equids Mesohippus and Miohippus has challenged paleontologists for years as many of the original diagnostic traits are not quantifiable. These genera coexisted geographically and temporally for five million years, further complicating matters. Due to unclear diagnoses and geographic and temporal overlap, modern studies have focused on tooth morphologies such as tooth dimensions and hypostyle shape to distinguish the genera. These researchers have argued for the synonymy of Mesohippus and Miohippus even though these studies have been limited geographically and temporally. This study addresses the validity of size comparisons of upper premolar 4 (P4) and molar 1 (M1) occlusal surface areas and hypostyle shapes as diagnostic traits. I focused on 4 sites for this analysis; John Day Fossil Beds National Monument in Oregon (John Day Fm., 30-23.8 Ma), Badlands National Park in South Dakota (Chadron & Brule Fm., 37-30 Ma), Toadstool Geologic Park in Nebraska (Chadron & Brule Fm., 37-30 Ma), and the Renova Formation in Montana (30-23 Ma). Using the comparison of P4 to M1 occlusal surface areas, the correct genus identification rate of fossil teeth in collections was 42%. A Mann-Whitney U test further supported the lack of distinction between these genera as no statistical significance (p = 0.33) was reported between P4 and M1 occlusal surface areas. The results of two ordinal logistic regressions indicated hypostyle shapes are statistically linked to tooth wear (approximated by height) (p = 5.78 × 10-5 and 0.0014), not genus as previously thought. These teeth morphologic traits have not shown to be statistically significant, making them a poor diagnostic metric. Based on these findings, Mesohippus and Miohippus should not be considered distinct genera and be synonymized to Miohippus. This changes the previously defined fossil record of Equidae and emphasizes the importance of utilizing quantifiable diagnostic characters.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-378189

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.