139 D23. Paleontology: Recent Developments in Diversity, Extinction, and Origination

Tuesday, 11 October 2022
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Mile High Ballroom 4C

COMPARISON OF EXTINCTION SELECTIVITY STRENGTH BETWEEN GEOGRAPHIC RANGE AND BODY SIZE OF FOSSIL MARINE ANIMALS ACROSS THE PHANEROZOIC

Paper number: 139-9
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 10:00 AM – 10:15 AM

Authors

Abstract

Numerous traits are selective during background intervals and mass extinctions across the Phanerozoic. Geographic range and body size are perhaps the two traits most commonly hypothesized to influence extinction risk, due to both their biological importance and their ease of measurement and comparison across disparate taxa. Despite much research on each trait, prior studies have not directly established which trait is more important in determining extinction risk during background extinction and whether their relative importance changes during mass extinction. Here, we measure extinction selectivity with respect to geographic range and body size for genera across five classes of fossil marine animals (Bivalvia, Gastropoda, Rhynchonellata, Strophomenata, and Trilobita), and compare selectivity during background intervals with the Big Five mass extinction events covering 485 Ma-1 Ma. We calculate a standard score for geographic range and body size to enable direct comparison of selectivity coefficients. We measure selectivity using capture-mark-recapture models and compare the log odds of extinction for geographic range and body size between background and mass extinctions. Extinction is strongly selective with respect to geographic range during background intervals, where genera with narrower geographic range exhibit higher selectivity across all classes. In contrast, selectivity on body size is statistically significant but substantially weaker for four classes, with the direction of selectivity varying across classes. During mass extinctions, selectivity on geographic range is reduced for all five classes, with three classes (Trilobita, Rhynchonellata, and Strophomenata) demonstrating no statistically significant association. Selectivity on body size varies by class, where the only significant association observed is against larger trilobite and smaller gastropod genera. The magnitude and pervasiveness of selectivity on geographic range during background intervals suggest that this effect dominates extinction patterns even when there is significant selectivity on other traits, such as body size. The reduction in selectivity on geographic range during mass extinction may enable other traits to become more important in shaping the surviving biota across mass extinction events.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-379691

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.