177 A. Keith Turner Memorial Session—Unto the Hills: A Career of Advancements in Digital Mapping, Computer Modelling, Environmental Hazards, and the Collaborations Made Along the Way

Tuesday, 11 October 2022
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Mile High Ballroom 4C

MODELLING DEPTH TO BEDROCK COMBINING MACHINE LEARNING AND GEOSTATISTICS: A PILOT STUDY IN NORTHERN SASKATCHEWAN

Paper number: 177-14
Program: Special Sessions
Time: 5:00 PM – 5:15 PM

Authors

Abstract

Representation of surficial sediment thickness across northern Canada in global datasets lacks resolution and precision. The lack of reliable thickness estimates is a challenge for mineral exploration, permafrost, groundwater, and geotechnical and infrastructure studies. Increasing interest in environmental stewardship for sustainable development under ESG guidelines, and for climate change further highlights the need for, and value of depth to bedrock interface information. Building surficial geology thickness maps is challenging given the sparse and preferentially clustered boreholes that must be combined with interpretative information and indirect measurements. In addition to being accurate, the maps must also provide a level of confidence and uncertainty in the estimates.

A machine learning workflow is proposed to generate thickness maps fusing several sources of information. Direct measurements of the thickness are precise but sparse and preferentially located around mineral rich areas such as faults. Indirect but abundant measurements such as geological maps, topography, remote sensing and geological interpretations data do not provide the actual depth.

Using Random Forest classifiers, indirect measurements are used to model thickness probabilities. These probabilities are adjusted to match ground measurements using a geostatistical technique called indicator cokriging. The results are thickness distributions (min, max, mean, median, quantiles, etc.) at all locations. This work emphasises the need for a dual approach between the integration of data into spatial trends and local anchoring to the ground measurements. Surficial information alone cannot predict thickness with great accuracy except for the outcrops themselves. It can, however, provide trends in thickness. The subsequent geostatistical approach can then integrate these trends with the ground measurements to bolster accuracy. The workflow is applied on a pilot zone in northern Saskatchewan.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-380112

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.