T161 Iris Moreno Totten Research in Geoscience Education Session

Tuesday, 11 October 2022
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
506

IMPACTS OF EXPLICIT SPATIAL TRAINING TO INCREASE EFFICACY, VALUE AND SUCCESS IN INTRODUCTORY GEOLOGY COURSES

Paper number: T161-14
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 11:15 AM – 11:30 AM

Authors

Abstract

Spatial skills have been repeatedly correlated with entrance, persistence and success in STEM fields, and are especially valuable to geologists. While the importance of these skills is known, explicit spatial training is rarely offered. This lack of training can be particularly impactful for underrepresented groups in the geosciences. Because these skills may serve as a filter for who joins and is successful in the geosciences, the lack of intentional spatial training is a clear problem that needs to be addressed. Studies have repeatedly shown that spatial skills can be improved with practice. Early training to improve these skills ensures that the most students are able to be successful and fully participate in their STEM courses.

This study investigates the research question: do students who complete spatial training modules significantly improve their final course grade, self-efficacy, and/or value compared to the control group? If so, what are the effect sizes of these changes and is there a minimum number of trainings needed to achieve this effect? We examined student responses to a spatial training intervention through the lens of Situated Expectancy Value Theory, which posits that improving self-efficacy and value will impact achievement-related choices and overall success.

In this case study, over 900 introductory level geology students were randomly divided into control and experimental groups over four semesters. Those in the experimental group were assigned ten spatial training exercises created and validated by Gold et al. (2018). Students in the control group completed assignments similar in the amount of time required. Control group assignments included content typical for an introductory geology class, but did not explicitly provide spatial training. Completion of either the control or experimental assignments accounted for five percent of the students’ final grade in the course. A five-section survey was used at the beginning and end of the course to measure efficacy and value in the students’ geology course, and in science overall, drawing from existing work from Glynn et al. (2011) and Hiller and Kitsantas (2016). Findings from this work provide insights into the degree to which spatial training supports achievement-related choices and overall success in introductory geology courses.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-381736

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.