T82 Source to Surface Magma Thermodynamics and Transport: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Documenting the How, Where, and When of Magma Generation and Evolution during Ascent, Storage, and Eruption I

Monday, 10 October 2022
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
502


EPHEMERAL MELT EXTRACTION AND SILICIC CUMULATE FORMATION IN AN UPPER CRUSTAL JAPANESE PLUTON

Paper number: T82-11
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 10:30 AM – 10:45 AM


Authors


Abstract

Explosive silicic eruptions are responsible for some of the most catastrophic events in Earth history, yet evidence of their growth and development is mainly derived from the resulting pyroclastic deposits. Discovery of plutonic systems which form by similar processes are important to investigate the timescales of upper crustal rhyolitic melt residence from the subvolcanic perspective. The ideal place to study the intrusive equivalents of silicic volcanic eruptions is within the shallow (≤10 km) plutons exposed at the roofs of young, active subduction zones. One such location is the Tottabetsu plutonic complex in northern Japan which displays petrologic and geochemical evidence of both silicic melt extraction and complementary silicic cumulate formation. Enrichments in Zr concentrations and positive Eu anomalies from diorites (>1250 ppm Zr) are matched by Zr depletions and negative Eu anomalies in the adjacent granites (≤ 250 ppm Zr), recording a non-protracted melt removal process that can be dated. We present the first U-Pb zircon geochronology from this Miocene pluton from three distinct geochemical domains of granite (71-75 wt. % SiO2), leucodiorite (60-70 wt. % SiO2), and diorite (53-57 wt. % SiO2). Zircon dates from all three span ~2 Ma from 19.5 to 17.5 Ma, coeval durations within the resolution of the LA-ICPMS technique. We discuss the implications of this ~2 Ma age dispersion and future plans for investigation of the pluton using petrochronology and thermochronology. Silicic cumulates may be more common in the rock record than currently appreciated, but detailed system-specific petrochronologic studies are needed for their identification, rather than using big data compilations.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-381936

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.