T29 Recent Advances in Soil and Paleosol Science (Posters)

Sunday, 9 October 2022
9:00 AM - 1:00 PM
Exhibit Hall F

RAPID CHANGE IN SOIL CARBONATES: DISCERNING ECOHYDROLOGICAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC DRIVERS USING GEOCHEMICAL AND ISOTOPIC TECHNIQUES

Paper number: T29-15
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 1:00 PM

Authors

Abstract

Soil carbonates are recognized as an important factor in global carbon (C) storage and reconstruction of paleoclimatic conditions. They account for roughly 39% of the terrestrial C pool (~950 Pg C) and in drylands can be >10 × organic C pools. Carbonates are often used to infer terrestrial precipitation regime and dominant vegetation types over timescales of 103-105 yr. Although carbonate formation and storage are often described on millennial timescales, several studies provide evidence of dynamic changes (i.e. yearly to decadal), with both increases and decreases in storage. These rapid gains or losses in soil carbonates due to natural and human-induced environmental changes may alter our accounting of terrestrial C budgets and provide both insights and challenges for paleoclimatic research.

In this study, we aim to characterize the isotopic signature of carbonates known to have formed during a long-term field experiment (Huber et al. 2019) as a means of assessing their sensitivity to anthropogenic activities, seasonality, and fast (i.e. decadal) environmental change. The ~20-year ecohydrological experiment manipulated water availability and thus carbonate formation in three ways: 1) plant community; 2) seasonality of water availability; and 3) maximum soil depth (i.e. control volume). The first two factors are both projected to change in the northwest region of the US.

Preliminary data shows significant changes in soil carbonate pools with change in vegetation and seasonal water availability did not result in clear shifts in δ13C and δ18O values. Profile carbonate δ13C and δ18O values were both enriched near the surface and depleted at depth relative to ambient controls, indicative of distinct atmospheric vs. respired CO2 sources. Although δ13C profile carbonates failed to differentiate, δ18O values showed distinct patterns between small vs. large control volume treatments, as well as underplant vs. interplant soil patch spaces. Noteworthy is the lack of differentiation in clumped isotope values (Δ47) between dormant vs. growing season irrigation treatments, indicative of similar environmental conditions during carbonate formation. This may denote key temporal dependence in ecohydrological processes during formation or result from insensitivity due to high background carbonate concentrations.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-382269

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.