T157 Conservation Paleobiology: Lessons from the Past, Guidance for the Future I

Tuesday, 11 October 2022
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Mile High Ballroom 4A

IMPORTANCE OF CONTROLLING FOR SEDIMENT GRAIN SIZE WHEN ASSESSING TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL PATTERNS OF ECOLOGICAL QUALITY IN CONSERVATION PALEOBIOLOGY

Paper number: T157-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:25 AM – 9:40 AM

Authors

Abstract

As human activities continue to modify marine systems, environmental managers and policy makers have sought after metrics that can identify potentially degraded sites and track changes in ecological quality. Several Indices (e.g., AZTI Marine Biotic Index (AMBI)) have been developed to assess changes in benthic macroinvertebrate community dynamics in relation to anthropogenic stressors (e.g., heavy metal concentrations, total organic carbon). However, such indices, and the stressors themselves, may vary along environmental gradients (e.g., salinity, grain size). Unless the variation in index scores to environmental gradients is accounted for, the indices may not accurately reflect the response of benthic communities to anthropogenic stress. To illustrate the impact of grain size on molluscan community dynamics, we compiled a dataset of benthic surveys conducted in Long Island Sound, NY and CT, over the past four decades and calculated Shannon entropy and AMBI scores across a gradient from fine-grained mud to coarse-grained sand. Our results indicate that both indices correlate with grain size, irrespective of anthropogenic stress, confirming the need to account for variation in index scores caused by changes in grain-size when assessing ecological quality. To evaluate whether conservation paleobiology (CPB) studies account for this potentially confounding factor, we conducted a review of the CPB literature published in the last two decades aimed at assessing changes in community dynamics from anthropogenic stress or providing baseline information on ecological quality. We found that consideration of variation in index scores that can be explained by differences in grain size of samples is often not accounted for. To realize the full potential of CPB to provide meaningful information on benthic community response to anthropogenic stressors, we recommend including information on grain-size in studies to allow for grain-size normalization and cross-study comparisons.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-382691

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.