T159 Groundwater for the Present and Future in the Mississippi Embayment Aquifer System, South-Central United States

Tuesday, 11 October 2022
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
405

COMPARISON OF INVERTED ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY DATA COLLECTED BY AERIAL ELECTROMAGNETICS AND SURFACE ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SURVEYS FROM THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER VALLEY ALLUVIUM AND UNDERLYING EOCENE STRATA AT PRESIDENT'S ISLAND, SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE

Paper number: T159-6
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:15 AM – 9:30 AM

Authors

Abstract

Defining hydrogeologic layers using inversion of electrical resistivity (ER) or airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data is an ill-posed problem. Previous studies have suggested resistivity varies based on geomorphic location and depositional environments, as well as with changing data collection methods. Understanding the similarity or dissimilarity of ER and AEM data will aid in identifying sediment types within a layer to define a hydrogeologic unit. Thus, this study compares the inverted ER and AEM properties of the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial (MRVA) and the upper Claiborne confining unit (UCCU) to understand their characteristic electrical properties and identify sandy intervals in the UCCU that may provide hydraulic connectivity to the underlying Memphis aquifer. The data for comparison ranges from the depth of 10m to 40m for MRVA, and 45m to 70m for the UCCU in an area with borehole control. The intervals for MRVA and UCCU were chosen with the help of borehole, ER, and AEM data to ensure constituent lithologic characteristics of both layers.

A preliminary statistical analysis shows that ER has higher resistivity ranges for both MRVA and UCCU than AEM. Moreover, the mean and the standard deviation is greater for ER than for AEM. P-values of <0.05 from different statistical hypothesis test (t-test, Welch t-test, and Mann Whitney U Test) suggest inequality in the mean resistivity of AEM and ER for both layers. The ER data show a greater range of resistivity for MRVA and UCCU than AEM likely due to the difference in the input current flow to the subsurface.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-383385

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.