54 D4. Energy Resource Development and Potential Environmental Effects
Sunday, 19 March 2023
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Lake Audubon
PRIORITY CONSIDERATIONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF GEOLOGIC ENERGY STORAGE
Paper number: 54-2
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 1:35 PM – 1:55 PM
Authors
-
Michelle R. PlampinU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
-
Brian A. VarelaU.S. Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO
-
Peter WarwickU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
-
Steven T. AndersonU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
-
Sean T. BrennanU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
-
Erick R. BurnsPortland, OR
-
Philip A. FreemanU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
-
Joao S. GallottiGeorge Mason University, Fairfax, VA
-
Joao S. GallottiU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
-
Celeste LohrU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
-
Matthew MerrillU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
-
Eric A. MorrisseyU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
Abstract
Geologic energy storage methods may be divided into three broad categories: Chemical, mechanical, and thermal. Chemical methods store potential energy in chemical bonds in the form of methane or natural gas, natural gas liquids, ammonia, and hydrogen. Mechanical methods store non-chemical potential energy using materials or fluids, and include techniques such as compressed air energy storage, with constant or variable temperatures; gravity energy storage using suspended loads; and pumped hydroelectric energy storage. Thermal methods store energy as heat in materials. Thermal energy storage includes underground hot- or cold-water storage for heating, cooling, or industrial processes such as drying. Geologic energy storage settings may include depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, abandoned mines, solution-mined caverns in salt, purpose-drilled shafts, or non-potable aquifers.
As one of the first steps toward assessing domestic geologic energy storage resources, the USGS is identifying depleted oil and gas reservoirs that could be used for chemical energy storage. Factors such as abandoned well locations, pore volume, and pressure gradients are being considered. The Illinois Basin is an initial focus area. Complementary assessment work has started to identify pore space in target formations that could be used for multiple energy storage applications such as geothermal or mechanical methods.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 55, No. 2
doi: 10.1130/abs/2023SE-385998
© Copyright 2023 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.